Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle microbiopsy in patients with pancreatic cysts

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and the COVID-19 pandemic

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting in severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Denmark: time trends and comparison with Sweden and the English National Health Service

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. A novel endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle microbiopsy procedure improves diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gastrointestinal endoscopy in Africa

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. EUS-guided through-the-needle microbiopsy of pancreatic cysts: Technical aspects (with video)

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: The limited data on the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided through-the-needle biopsies (TTNBs) in patients with pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) originate mainly from retrospective studies. Our aim was to determine the clinical impact of TTNBs, their added diagnostic value, and the adverse event rate in a prospective setting.

METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, open-label controlled study. Between February 2018 and August 2019, consecutive patients presenting with a PCL of 15 mm or more and referred for EUS were included. Primary outcome was a change in clinical management of PCLs following TTNB compared with cross-sectional imaging and cytology. Adverse events were defined according to the ASGE lexicon.

RESULTS: 101 patients were included. TTNBs led to a change in clinical management in 11.9 % of cases (n = 12). Of these, 10 had serous cysts and surveillance was discontinued, while one of the remaining two cases underwent surgery following diagnosis of a mucinous cystic neoplasm. The diagnostic yield of TTNBs for a specific cyst diagnosis was higher compared with FNA cytology (69.3 % vs. 20.8 %, respectively; P < 0.001). The adverse event rate was 9.9 % (n = 10; 95 % confidence interval 5.4 % - 17.3 %), with the most common event being acute pancreatitis (n = 9). Four of the observed adverse events were severe, including one fatal outcome.

CONCLUSIONS: TTNBs resulted in a change of clinical management in about one in every 10 patients; however, the associated adverse event risk was substantial. Further studies are warranted to elucidate in which subgroups of patients the clinical benefit outweighs the risks.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEndoscopy
ISSN0013-726X
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Jul 2020

ID: 60555799