Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical and echocardiographic risk factors for device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure: an analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry

Vivian Vij, Kerstin Piayda, Dominik Nelles, Steffen Gloekler, Roberto Galea, Monika Fürholz, Bernhard Meier, Marco Valgimigli, Gilles O'Hara, Dabit Arzamendi, Victor Agudelo, Lluis Asmarats, Xavier Freixa, Eduardo Flores-Umanzor, Ole De Backer, Lars Søndergaard, Luis Nombela-Franco, Angela McInerney, Kasper Korsholm, Jens Erik Nielsen-KudskShazia Afzal, Tobias Zeus, Felix Operhalski, Boris Schmidt, Gilles Montalescot, Paul Guedeney, Xavier Iriart, Noelie Miton, Jacqueline Saw, Thomas Gilhofer, Laurent Fauchier, Egzon Veliqi, Felix Meincke, Nils Petri, Peter Nordbeck, Dmitrii Ognerubov, Evgeny Merkulov, Ignacio Cruz-González, Rocio Gonzalez-Ferreiro, Deepak L Bhatt, Alessandra Laricchia, Antonio Mangieri, Heyder Omran, Jan Wilko Schrickel, Josep Rodes-Cabau, Horst Sievert, Georg Nickenig, Alexander Sedaghat*

*Corresponding author for this work
26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on Device-related Thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate risk factors for DRT from centers reporting to the EUROC-DRT registry.

METHODS: We included 537 patients (112 with DRT and 425 without DRT) who had undergone LAAC between 12/2008 and 04/2019. Baseline and implantation characteristics, anti-thrombotic treatment and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups in uni- and multivariate analyses. Additional propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to focus on the role of implantation characteristics.

RESULTS: Patients with DRT showed higher rates of previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (49.1% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.01), spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) (44.9% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.01) and lower left atrial appendage (LAA) peak emptying velocity (35.4 ± 18.5 vs. 42.4 ± 18.0 cm/s, p = 0.02). Occluders implanted in DRT patients were larger (25.5 ± 3.8 vs. 24.6 ± 3.5 mm, p = 0.03) and implanted deeper in the LAA (mean depth: 7.6 ± 4.7 vs. 5.7 ± 4.7 mm, p < 0.01). Coverage of the appendage ostium was achieved less often in DRT patients (69.5% vs. 81.5%, p < 0.01), while DRT patients were less frequently on oral anticoagulation (7.1% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified age, prior stroke/TIA and SEC as independent risk factors for DRT. After PSM, implantation depth was found to be predictive. Rates of stroke/TIA were higher in DRT patients (13.5% vs. 3.8%, Hazard Ratio: 4.21 [95%-confidence interval: 1.88-9.49], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: DRT after LAAC is associated with adverse outcome and appears to be of multifactorial origin, depending on patient characteristics, anticoagulation regimen and device position.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
Volume111
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1276-1285
Number of pages10
ISSN1861-0684
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
  • Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging
  • Atrial Fibrillation/complications
  • Echocardiography
  • Humans
  • Ischemic Attack, Transient
  • Registries
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke/diagnosis
  • Thrombosis/diagnosis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Stroke
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Left atrial appendage closure
  • Device-related thrombus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical and echocardiographic risk factors for device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure: an analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this