TY - JOUR
T1 - Circadian patterns of atrial fibrillation and disease progression assessed by implanted loop recorders
AU - Spona, Daniel Camillo
AU - Haugan, Ketil Jørgen
AU - Graff, Claus
AU - Højberg, Søren
AU - Krieger, Derk
AU - Brandes, Axel
AU - Køber, Lars
AU - Olesen, Morten S
AU - Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup
AU - Diederichsen, Søren Zöga
N1 - © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].
PY - 2025/6/16
Y1 - 2025/6/16
N2 - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The heterogeneity of atrial fibrillation (AF) necessitates better phenotyping. This study aimed to explore circadian patterns of AF and their impact on AF characteristics and progression.METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the LOOP study randomizing 6004 older, AF-naïve persons with risk factors for AF and stroke 1:3 to receive implantable loop recorder screening or usual care. Implantable loop recorder data were extracted from 1410 participants to obtain AF episode characteristics.RESULTS: A total of 41 713 AF episodes lasting at least 6 min were identified among 430 patients undergoing 39 (37-41) months of monitoring. The most frequent onset hour was 9 a.m., which was twice as likely as 9 p.m. Night-time AF episodes (onset 10 p.m.-7 a.m., 40% of all episodes) lasted longer [28 (10-104) vs 14 (8-44) min] and had slower ventricular rate [75 (60-86) vs 85 (75-100) b.p.m.] compared with daytime episodes. K-means clustering revealed two distinct groups of patients with mostly midnight-morning [median 6 a.m. (3 a.m.-11 a.m.)] and daytime [median 12 p.m. (9 a.m.-5 p.m.)], onset respectively. Patients in the midnight-morning cluster had higher AF burden [0.2 (0.1-1.2) vs 0.1 (0.0-0.4)%, P < .001] and more progression (28% vs 18% progressed to ≥24-h episodes, P = .019) compared to those in the daytime cluster.CONCLUSIONS: A circadian pattern was observed for ILR-detected AF, with onset most often before noon. Cluster analyses revealed distinct AF phenotypes with different patterns of onset and progression over time. These exploratory findings warrant studies investigating the timing of AF screening and the selection of patients for rhythm control vs more conservative strategies.
AB - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The heterogeneity of atrial fibrillation (AF) necessitates better phenotyping. This study aimed to explore circadian patterns of AF and their impact on AF characteristics and progression.METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the LOOP study randomizing 6004 older, AF-naïve persons with risk factors for AF and stroke 1:3 to receive implantable loop recorder screening or usual care. Implantable loop recorder data were extracted from 1410 participants to obtain AF episode characteristics.RESULTS: A total of 41 713 AF episodes lasting at least 6 min were identified among 430 patients undergoing 39 (37-41) months of monitoring. The most frequent onset hour was 9 a.m., which was twice as likely as 9 p.m. Night-time AF episodes (onset 10 p.m.-7 a.m., 40% of all episodes) lasted longer [28 (10-104) vs 14 (8-44) min] and had slower ventricular rate [75 (60-86) vs 85 (75-100) b.p.m.] compared with daytime episodes. K-means clustering revealed two distinct groups of patients with mostly midnight-morning [median 6 a.m. (3 a.m.-11 a.m.)] and daytime [median 12 p.m. (9 a.m.-5 p.m.)], onset respectively. Patients in the midnight-morning cluster had higher AF burden [0.2 (0.1-1.2) vs 0.1 (0.0-0.4)%, P < .001] and more progression (28% vs 18% progressed to ≥24-h episodes, P = .019) compared to those in the daytime cluster.CONCLUSIONS: A circadian pattern was observed for ILR-detected AF, with onset most often before noon. Cluster analyses revealed distinct AF phenotypes with different patterns of onset and progression over time. These exploratory findings warrant studies investigating the timing of AF screening and the selection of patients for rhythm control vs more conservative strategies.
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf386
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf386
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40521807
SN - 0195-668X
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
ER -