Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Characterization of Familial and Sporadic Migraine

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Modulators - The History and Renaissance of a New Migraine Drug Class

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Levcromakalim, an Adenosine Triphosphate-Sensitive Potassium Channel Opener, Dilates Extracerebral but not Cerebral Arteries

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Misused and Misleading: "100% Response Rate" to Galcanezumab in Patients With Episodic Migraine

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  4. The Journey to Establish CGRP as a Migraine Target: A Retrospective View

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether clinical parameters differ between migraineurs with and without first-degree family members with migraine.

OBJECTIVES: The present cross-sectional study describes differences between familial and sporadic migraine with a focus on migraine characteristics, migraine severity, comorbidities, and treatment.

METHOD: From the Danish Headache Center we recruited 358 patients with familial migraine and 1727 patients with sporadic migraine. Each participant was assessed using a validated semi-structured interview.

RESULTS: No differences in age (Mean = 44 and 44 [SD = 12.28 and 12.58] for familial and sporadic migraineurs, respectively; P = .900) or sex (295/358 (82.4%) and 1413/1727 (81.8%) women in familial and sporadic migraineurs, respectively; P = .853) were found. Familial migraineurs had more aphasic aura than sporadic migraineurs (41% vs 27%, P = .001). Sporadic migraineurs had more lifetime attacks ie, >100 attacks (45% vs 70%, P < .001) and prolonged attacks ie, lasting >72 hours (5% vs 12%, P < .001) than familial migraineurs. Further, sporadic migraineurs had a higher incidence of concussions (37% vs 41%, P = .001) compared to familial migraineurs. In agreement with a previous study, there was no difference between familial and sporadic migraine regarding triptan response (84% vs 81%, P = .440).

CONCLUSION: Headache characteristics, triptan response, and comorbidities where similar in individulas with and without inherited migraine, suggesting that migraine are to be considered a hmogenoues disease. The difference in the clinical presentation of migraine with aura symptoms among patients with familial migraine should be considered in future studies. Further, more severe migraine among patients with sporadic migraine with aura could suggest that sporadic migraineurs have been exposed to stronger or multiple environmental factors and indicate that an early intervention in migraine treatment could lessen the severity of migraine.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHeadache Online
Volume59
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)1802-1807
Number of pages6
ISSN1526-4610
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

ID: 58408987