Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO-restriction in endurance athletes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Increased oral sodium chloride intake in humans amplifies selectively postprandial GLP-1 but not GIP, CCK, and gastrin in plasma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Four days of bed rest increases intrinsic mitochondrial respiratory capacity in young healthy males

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. High-intensity interval training changes mitochondrial respiratory capacity differently in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Acute administration of interleukin-6 does not increase secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 in mice

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Heterogeneity in subcellular muscle glycogen utilisation during exercise impacts endurance capacity in men

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Effect of insulin on natriuretic peptide gene expression in porcine heart

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor in monozygotic twins with, at risk of and without affective disorders

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Carbohydrate (CHO) restricted training has been shown to increase the acute training response, whereas less is known about the acute effects after repeated CHO restricted training. On two occasions, the acute responses to CHO restriction were examined in endurance athletes. Study 1 examined cellular signaling and metabolic responses after seven training-days including CHO manipulation (n = 16). The protocol consisted of 1 h high-intensity cycling, followed by 7 h recovery, and 2 h of moderate-intensity exercise (120SS). Athletes were randomly assigned to low (LCHO: 80 g) or high (HCHO: 415 g) CHO during recovery and the 120SS. Study 2 examined unaccustomed exposure to the same training protocol (n = 12). In Study 1, muscle biopsies were obtained at rest and 1 h after 120SS, and blood samples drawn during the 120SS. In Study 2, substrate oxidation and plasma glucagon were determined. In Study 1, plasma insulin and proinsulin C-peptide were higher during the 120SS in HCHO compared to LCHO (insulin: 0 min: +37%; 60 min: +135%; 120 min: +357%, P = 0.05; proinsulin C-peptide: 0 min: +32%; 60 min: +52%; 120 min: +79%, P = 0.02), whereas plasma cholesterol was higher in LCHO (+15-17%, P = 0.03). Myocellular signaling did not differ between groups. p-AMPK and p-ACC were increased after 120SS (+35%, P = 0.03; +59%, P = 0.0004, respectively), with no alterations in p-p38, p-53, or p-CREB. In Study 2, glucagon and fat oxidation were higher in LCHO compared to HCHO during the 120SS (+26-40%, P = 0.03; +44-76%, P = 0.01 respectively). In conclusion, the clear respiratory and hematological effects of CHO restricted training were not translated into superior myocellular signaling after accustomization to CHO restriction.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPhysiological Reports
Volume6
Issue number17
Pages (from-to)e13847
ISSN2051-817X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

ID: 55649440