Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Changes in diabetes distress among people with type 2 diabetes during a risk screening programme for diabetic kidney disease - Longitudinal observations of the PRIORITY study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Relation of cardiac adipose tissue to coronary calcification and myocardial microvascular function in type 1 and type 2 diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Describing the fecal metabolome in cryogenically collected samples from healthy participants

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is a risk marker for complications in persons with type 1 diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearch

  4. Discrimination and stigma among people with type 2 diabetes in the workplace: prejudice against illness or obesity?

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIMS: To investigate levels and changes in diabetes distress over the course of the PRIORITY (Proteomic prediction and Renin angiotensin aldosterone system Inhibition prevention Of early diabetic nephRopathy In people with TYpe 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria) randomised controlled trial of screening for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) risk among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at a specialist diabetes clinic in Denmark.

METHODS: Of 436 trial participants with T2D, 216 were invited to complete the 17-item diabetes distress scale at the time of screening (T1, n = 180), immediately after receiving the screening results at 6-8 weeks (T2, n = 169), and at 12 months follow up (T3, n = 107). Linear mixed models were used to explore changes in diabetes distress.

RESULTS: No significant changes in diabetes distress were observed between the time of screening, receiving results, and at 12 months. Changes in diabetes distress were not influenced by diabetes empowerment, sense of coherence, or perceived support for diabetes self-management.

CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies demonstrating that screening programmes can have negative psychological consequences, our findings indicate that participating in this screening programme for DKD does not influence emotional burden or physician-related distress among people with T2D.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107467
JournalJournal of Diabetes and its Complications
Volume34
Issue number1
ISSN1056-8727
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

    Research areas

  • Diabetes distress, Diabetes mellitus, type 2, Diabetic nephropathy, Risk screening

ID: 58285547