Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Challenges in optimising recovery after emergency laparotomy

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. From variance to guidance for awake tracheal intubation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Red blood cell transfusion in surgery: an observational study of the trends in the USA from 2011 to 2016

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Variation in the practice of tracheal intubation in Europe after traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Enhanced postoperative recovery: good from afar, but far from good?

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  5. The clinical implication of the association between hypoxaemia and postoperative troponin I: a reply

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  1. A simple method to secure data-driven improvement of perioperative care

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Comment on "Epidural Analgesia (TEA) vs. IV-PCA After Open Liver Surgery"

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  3. Enhanced recovery after surgery components and perioperative outcomes: a nationwide observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Standardised peri-operative care pathways for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy for non-traumatic pathologies have been shown to be inadequate and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent research has highlighted this problem and showed that simple pathways with 'rescue' interventions have been associated with reduced mortality when implemented successfully. These rescue pathways have focused on early diagnosis and surgery, specialist surgeon and anaesthetist involvement, goal-directed therapy and intensive or intermediary postoperative care for high-risk patients. In elective surgery, enhanced recovery has resulted in reduced length of stay and morbidity by the application of procedure-specific, evidence-based interventions inside rigorously implemented patient pathways based on multidisciplinary co-operation. The focus has been on attenuation of peri-operative stress and pain management to facilitate early recovery. Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy are a heterogeneous group consisting mostly of patients with intestinal perforations and/or obstruction with varying levels of comorbidity and frailty. However, present knowledge of the different pathophysiology and peri-operative trajectory of complications in these patient groups is limited. In order to move beyond rescue pathways and to establish enhanced recovery for emergency laparotomy, it is essential that research on both the peri-operative pathophysiology of the different main patient groups - intestinal obstruction and perforation - and the potentially differentiated impact of interventions is carried out. Procedure- and pathology-specific knowledge is lacking on key elements of peri-operative care, such as: multimodal analgesia; haemodynamic optimisation and fluid management; attenuation of surgical stress; nutritional optimisation; facilitation of mobilisation; and the optimal use and organisation of specialised wards and improved interdisciplinary collaboration. As such, the future challenges in improving peri-operative patient care in emergency laparotomy are moving from simple rescue pathways to establish research that can form a basis for morbidity- and procedure-specific enhanced recovery protocols as seen in elective surgery.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume75 Suppl 1
Pages (from-to)e83-e89
ISSN0003-2409
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

ID: 58903260