Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Categorization of changes in the Oxford Knee Score after Total Knee Replacement: An interpretive tool developed from a dataset of 46,094 replacements

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Validation studies in epidemiologic research: Estimation of the positive predictive value

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. A new tool to assess Clinical Diversity In Meta-analyses (CDIM) of interventions

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Effect Modifiers and Statistical Tests for Interaction in Randomized Trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Collection and Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Arthroplasty Registries: Multinational Survey and Recommendations

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): don't stratify on the baseline score!

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. No increase in postoperative contacts with the healthcare system following outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Assessing the utility of deep neural networks in predicting postoperative surgical complications: a retrospective study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to create an interpretive categorical classification for the transition in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) change score (ΔOKS) using the anchor-based method.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Registry data from 46,094 total knee replacements from the year 2014/15, were accessed via the Health and Social Care Information Center official website. Data included preoperative and 6-month follow-up OKS and response to the transition anchor question. Categories were determined using Gaussian approximation probability and k-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS: Four categories were identified with the corresponding ΔOKS intervals: "1. much better" (≥16), "2. a little better" (7-15), "3. about the same" (1-6), and "4. much worse" (≤0) based on the anchor questions' original five categories. The mean 10-fold cross-validation error was 0.35 OKS points (95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.63). Sensitivity ranged from 0.34 to 0.68; specificity ranged from 0.74 to 0.95.

CONCLUSION: We have categorized the change score into a clinically meaningful classification. We argue it should be an addition to the continuous OKS outcome to contextualize the results in a way more applicable to the shared decision-making process and for interpreting research results.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume132
Pages (from-to)18-25
Number of pages8
ISSN0895-4356
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • Interpretive tool, Knee replacement, Oxford Knee Score, Patient-reported outcome

ID: 61502301