Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Case Study Cognitive Processing in Anger and Verbal Aggression among Male Forensic Inpatients – a case series using metacognitive profiling

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Rumination-focused cognitive behaviour therapy for non-responsive chronic depression: an uncontrolled group study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Group rumination-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) v. group CBT for depression: phase II trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Terapeutisk samtaleteknik: Dialogen i kognitiv adfærdsterapi

    Research output: Book/ReportBookCommunication

  4. The Metacognitive Anger Processing (MAP) Scale - Validation in a Mixed Clinical and a Forensic In-Patient Sample

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
Background: Maladaptive cognitive processes have been evidenced in problem anger, and anger rumination is empirically well-established to increase anger and aggression. Negative and positive beliefs about anger may be involved in the selection of maladaptive mental strategies such as angry rumination. The current study explored male forensic inpatients’ self-reports of meta-beliefs about anger in episodes involving anger and verbal aggression. Method: Five male forensic inpatients participated in a larger data collection were interviewed after a verbally aggressive episode to explore the problematic processing routines and metacognitions activated during anger arousal. Measures: Anger was measured using the NAS, aggression using the SOAS-R, and metacognitive beliefs using the MAP. Patients were interviewed using the `metacognitive profiling´ developed by Wells. Results: All five participants confirmed activated negative meta-beliefs, three confirmed positive meta-beliefs, and three patients confirmed rumination in association with the anger episode concerning the interview. Conclusion: Male forensic inpatients could successfully report details on their cognitive processes during a recent anger episode, and the metacognitive perspective on anger seems clinically relevant to apply in this setting. Modifying the cognitive structures responsible for the selection of rumination as a mental strategy in situations of anger might prove helpful in anger interventions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Psychiatry and Behaviour Therapy
Volume2
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)59-63
ISSN2638-9959
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

    Research areas

  • Health Sciences - anger, male forensic inpatients, metacognitive beliefs, rumination, verbal aggression

ID: 59354943