Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Breast cancer screening implementation and reassurance

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Rooting European HP-research!

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

  2. Rooting European Public Health and Health Promotion research

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

  3. Education policies targeting refugee and immigrant children in the Nordic countries

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

  4. School-based health promotion as ‘add-in’: Integrating health in curriculum timePeter Bocz Bentsen

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

  5. Socio-economic position and time trends in invasive management and case fatality after acute myocardial infarction in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Lolland-Falster Health Study: Study protocol for a household-based prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Five-Year Trends in Marital Stability, Academic Achievement, and Socioeconomic Indicators After Concussion: A National Register Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Domain-specific cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery. A secondary analysis of a randomized trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Women not offered screening mammography reported higher levels of negative psychosocial aspects than women offered screening. This was demonstrated in a questionnaire survey where 1000 women were included: 500 women living in areas where the public authorities had never offered screening mammography and 500 women living in areas where women had been invited to screening mammography for >10 years. After this baseline survey, nationwide screening mammography was implemented. The aim of this follow-up study was to resurvey the 1000 women and to investigate if the identified difference in reported psychosocial aspects had disappeared or been reduced because of the nationwide screening implementation.

METHODS: The 1000 women included in the previous survey were posted part I of the questionnaire Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC1) in August 2011, nearly 5 years after they received the COS-BC1 the first time.

RESULTS: A total of 677 women returned the questionnaire. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in reported psychosocial aspects. Women new to screening reported less negative psychosocial aspects compared with the previous survey.

CONCLUSION: An implementation of a screening mammography programme provides reassurance for those women invited to the screening. This reassurance is in contrast to the unbalanced proportion between the intended benefits and the unintended harms of the screening programme.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean journal of public health
Volume24
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)258-63
Number of pages6
ISSN1210-7778
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

ID: 44461866