Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Bioimpedance as a measure of fluid status in critically ill patients: A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Continuing professional development (CPD) for anesthesiologists: a systematic review protocol

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Handling oxygenation targets in ICU patients with COVID-19-Protocol and statistical analysis plan in the HOT-COVID trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Hypophosphataemia is common in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia: the COVID STEROID randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Handling oxygenation targets in ICU patients with COVID-19-Protocol and statistical analysis plan in the HOT-COVID trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia: the COVID STEROID randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of two Early Warning Score systems to Identify Patient Deterioration-A Focus Group Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Precise measurements of fluid status lack valid methods. Bioimpedance is an attractive diagnostic tool because it is noninvasive, quick, and relatively cheap. This systematic review aims to assess the existing evidence of bioimpedance as an accurate measure of fluid status in critically ill patients.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase up till March 2021 were systematically searched (PROSPERO: CRD42020157436).

STUDY SELECTION: Eligibility criteria were studies reporting original data from cohorts of adult patients in intensive care units and doing at least one whole-body bioimpedance and one reference test. In addition, studies assessing internal reproducibility were included.

DATA EXTRACTION: An extraction form was designed for the purpose.

DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine hundred five studies were screened for eligibility, and 28 studies, comprising 1482 individual patients, were included in the final analysis. Eight studies compared bioimpedance with a gold standard, and two of those reported the results adequate. We found a low mean difference, but the 95% limits of agreements had wide limits. The remaining studies applied different surrogates as reference tests. Correlations ranged from 0.05 to 0.99. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty of evidence for all outcomes was very low.

CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of bioimpedance as a measure for fluids in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit cannot be determined. Due to the lack of a gold standard, numerous studies compared bioimpedance with surrogate outcomes with great variability in both designs and results. Assessing the internal reproducibility of bioimpedance had the same limitations, but the studies overall reported good internal reproducibility.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume65
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1155-1167
Number of pages13
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

    Research areas

  • bioelectrical impedance, body fluid, critical illness, intensive care unit, organism hydration status, systematic review

ID: 66429195