Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bioequivalence and tolerability assessment of a novel intravenous ciclosporin lipid emulsion compared to branded ciclosporin in Cremophor ® EL

Karl Henrik Johannes Ehinger, Magnus Joakim Hansson, Fredrik Sjövall, Eskil Elmér

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Ciclosporin is used as an immunosuppressant in current clinical practice but recent research implies novel indications for the drug, such as neuro- and cardioprotection. The intravenous formulation currently on the market, Sandimmune(®) Injection (Sandimmune(®)), uses Cremophor(®) EL as emulsifying excipient. Cremophor(®) EL is known to cause hypersensitivity reactions in some patients, ranging from skin reactions to potentially fatal anaphylactic shock.

    OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess if CicloMulsion(®), a Cremophor(®) EL-free lipid emulsion of ciclosporin for intravenous administration, is bioequivalent to Sandimmune(®), and the secondary objective was to compare the tolerability profiles of the two preparations.

    METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, subject-blind, laboratory-blind, single-dose, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of two formulations of intravenous ciclosporin. Fifty-two healthy volunteer subjects were administered 5 mg/kg of each of the two formulations of ciclosporin as a 4-h intravenous infusion. The last blood sample was acquired 48 h after the end of the infusion. Bioequivalence assessments according to current guidelines were performed.

    RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios for CicloMulsion(®)/Sandimmune(®) (90 % confidence interval [CI]) were 0.90 (0.88, 0.92) for AUC(0-last) (area under the blood concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration) and 0.95 (0.92, 0.97) for C(max) (maximum blood concentration). For all additional variables analysed, the 90 % CIs were also within the accepted bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. One anaphylactoid and one anaphylactic reaction, both classified as serious adverse events, were reported after treatment with Sandimmune(®). No serious adverse events were recorded after treatment with CicloMulsion(®).

    CONCLUSION: We have assessed the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a new Cremophor(®) EL-free lipid emulsion of ciclosporin, CicloMulsion(®), compared to Sandimmune(®). The proportion of adverse events was significantly higher for the Cremophor(®) EL-based product Sandimmune(®). We conclude that CicloMulsion(®) is bioequivalent to Sandimmune(®) and exhibits fewer adverse reactions.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalClinical Drug Investigation
    Volume33
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)25-34
    Number of pages10
    ISSN1173-2563
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

    Keywords

    • Adolescent
    • Adult
    • Area Under Curve
    • Biological Availability
    • Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
    • Cross-Over Studies
    • Cyclosporine
    • Emulsifying Agents
    • Excipients
    • Fat Emulsions, Intravenous
    • Female
    • Glycerol
    • Half-Life
    • Humans
    • Immunosuppressive Agents
    • Infusions, Intravenous
    • Male
    • Metabolic Clearance Rate
    • Middle Aged
    • South Africa
    • Therapeutic Equivalency
    • Young Adult

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bioequivalence and tolerability assessment of a novel intravenous ciclosporin lipid emulsion compared to branded ciclosporin in Cremophor ® EL'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this