Abstract
The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) relies on clinical assessment, D-dimer test and diagnostic imaging. Modern CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and SPECT/CT are rather equal in terms of sensitivity, specificity and inconclusive results for the diagnosis of PE, outper-forming planar lung scintigraphy. Furthermore, SPECT/CT and CTPA can both provide important information regarding differential diagnoses. Thus, the choice of primary diag-nostic modality relies on local expertise, availability and special circumstances like radiation dose, contraindications and the clinical urgency.
| Translated title of the contribution | The choice of diagnostic modality for acute pulmonary embolism |
|---|---|
| Original language | Danish |
| Article number | V05170391 |
| Journal | Ugeskrift for Laeger |
| Volume | 180 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| ISSN | 0041-5782 |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Feb 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The choice of diagnostic modality for acute pulmonary embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS