Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Barriers to, and Facilitators of, Exercising in Fitness Centres among Adults with and without Physical Disabilities: A Scoping Review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review


  1. Social Distancing Policies in the Coronavirus Battle: A Comparison of Denmark and Sweden

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Motivation, Barriers, and Suggestions for Intradialytic Exercise-A Qualitative Study among Patients and Nurses

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Facilitators and Barriers for Young Medical Doctors Writing Their First Manuscript for Publication

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Infographic. Benefits and harms of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  2. Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Joint hypermobility in athletes is associated with shoulder injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Fitness centres are an obvious arena for performing physical activity for the general population but representation of adults with physical disabilities (AwPD) is lacking. To increase possibilities for AwPD to exercise in fitness centres together with adults without physical disabilities (AwoPD), the aim of this study was to identify, synthesise, and compare barriers to, and facilitators of, exercising in fitness centres for each group. A scoping review was conducted and data extraction of the barriers and facilitators was performed independently by two researchers on six categories of contextual factors based on the framework of Di Blasi: (1) The fitness centre setting; (2) The fitness centre user characteristics; (3) The fitness instructor/staff characteristics; (4) The fitness centre user-instructor/management relationship; and (5) The fitness/exercise characteristics. An extra category, (6) Other relationships, was added. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews was used for reporting. Of the 102 included papers, only 26 (25%) of the papers were on AwPD, which focused mainly on physical barriers (category 1: inaccessible settings). In contrast, the remaining 76 papers involving AwoPD focused primarily on facilitators (category 2: motivational factors and exercising effects). In categories 3-6, the two groups had similar results, as both groups preferred skilled instructors, a welcoming and comfortable fitness centre environment, an ability to exercise at their preferred type and level, and good social connections. Since most data were based on AwoPD, more studies on actual experiences from AwPD are needed, to reveal the facilitators/motivational factors for fitness centre use.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7341
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Issue number14
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jul 2021

    Research areas

  • Accessibility, Contextual factors, Disabilities, Fitness centre, Fitness instructors, Gym, Personal factors, Scoping review, Social connections

ID: 66933901