Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Automated external defibrillator accessibility is crucial for bystander defibrillation and survival: A registry-based study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients With Psychiatric Disorders - Characteristics and Outcomes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Improving the cost-effectiveness of laypersons' paediatric basic life support skills training: A randomised non-inferiority study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. A nationwide investigation of CPR courses, books, and skill retention

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Association between Type D personality and outcomes in patients with non-ischemic heart failure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Satisfaction of 30 402 callers to a medical helpline of the Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen: a retrospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Polygenic predisposition to breast cancer and the risk of coronary artery disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Cardiovascular Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Aims Optimization of automated external defibrillator (AED) placement and accessibility are warranted. We examined the associations between AED accessibility, at the time of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival, as well as AED coverage according to AED locations. Methods In this registry-based study we identified all OHCAs registered by mobile emergency care units in Copenhagen, Denmark (2008-2016). Information regarding registered AEDs (2007-2016) was retrieved from the nationwide Danish AED Network. We calculated AED coverage (AEDs located ≤200 m route distance from an OHCA) and, according to AED accessibility, the likelihoods of bystander defibrillation and 30-day survival. Results Of 2500 OHCAs, 22.6% (n = 566) were covered by a registered AED. At the time of OHCA, <50% of these AEDs were accessible (n = 276). OHCAs covered by an accessible AED were nearly three times more likely to receive bystander defibrillation (accessible: 13.8% vs. inaccessible: 4.8%, p < 0.001) and twice as likely to achieve 30-day survival (accessible: 28.8% vs. inaccessible: 16.4%, p < 0.001). Among bystander-witnessed OHCAs with shockable heart rhythms (accessible vs. inaccessible AEDs), bystander defibrillation rates were 39.8% vs. 20.3% (p = 0.01) and 30-day survival rates were 72.7% vs. 44.1% (p < 0.001). Most OHCAs were covered by AEDs at offices (18.6%), schools (13.3%), and sports facilities (12.9%), each with a coverage loss >50%, due to limited AED accessibility. Conclusions The chance of a bystander defibrillation was tripled, and 30-day survival nearly doubled, when the nearest AED was accessible, compared to inaccessible, at the time of OHCA, underscoring the importance of unhindered AED accessibility.

Original languageEnglish
JournalResuscitation
Volume136
Pages (from-to)30-37
Number of pages8
ISSN0300-9572
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

    Research areas

  • automated external defibrillator, cardiac arrest, resuscitation, survival

ID: 56428747