TY - JOUR
T1 - Atypical intraductal proliferation in prostate biopsy — a diagnostic grey zone with clinical implications
AU - Bernardino, Rui M.
AU - Lobo, João
AU - Kaouk, Jihad
AU - van der Kwast, Theodorus
AU - Prendeville, Susan
AU - Zanotti, Fabio
AU - Bianchi, Lorenzo
AU - Martini, Alberto
AU - Rajwa, Pawel
AU - Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
AU - Marra, Giancarlo
AU - Fleshner, Neil
AU - Sigle, August
AU - Scheltema, Matthijs
AU - Roesch, Marie Christine
AU - Puche Sanz, Ignacio
AU - Miszczyk, Marcin
AU - Mercinelli, Chiara
AU - Maggi, Martina
AU - Le Guevelou, Jennifer
AU - Hogehout, Renee
AU - Giesen, Alexander
AU - Fazekas, Tamás
AU - Fasulo, Vittorio
AU - Falagario, Ugo
AU - Ambrosini, Francesca
AU - Zattoni, Fabio
AU - Soeterik, Timo
AU - Rodriguez-Sanchez, Lara
AU - Rajwa, Pawel
AU - Preisser, Felix
AU - Olivier, Jonathan
AU - Nicoletti, Rossella
AU - Kesch, Claudia
AU - Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
AU - Heidegger, Isabel
AU - Giganti, Francesco
AU - Bauckneht, Matteo
AU - Bianchi, Lorenzo
AU - Young Academic Urologists Working Group Prostate Cancer Board
A2 - Bernardino, Rui
A2 - Matsukawa, Akihiro
A2 - Stroomberg, Hein
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Limited 2025.
PY - 2025/11/7
Y1 - 2025/11/7
N2 - Atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) is considered a borderline lesion, characterized by architectural complexity and cytological atypia greater than that seen in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, but insufficient to fulfil the diagnostic criteria for intraductal carcinoma (IDC). Consequently, AIP remains diagnostically challenging, and the clinical significance of this lesion is still uncertain. Emerging evidence suggests that AIP in prostate biopsy specimens is a strong predictor of unsampled IDC and other adverse pathological features, warranting reconsideration of the AIP role in prostate cancer risk stratification. Results from prospective and molecular studies indicate that AIP frequently coexists with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and shares molecular alterations with IDC, such as PTEN loss and ERG overexpression, reinforcing AIP potential as a marker of occult aggressive disease. Considering the growing emphasis on precision diagnostics and active surveillance in prostate cancer management, understanding the implications of AIP is particularly relevant.
AB - Atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) is considered a borderline lesion, characterized by architectural complexity and cytological atypia greater than that seen in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, but insufficient to fulfil the diagnostic criteria for intraductal carcinoma (IDC). Consequently, AIP remains diagnostically challenging, and the clinical significance of this lesion is still uncertain. Emerging evidence suggests that AIP in prostate biopsy specimens is a strong predictor of unsampled IDC and other adverse pathological features, warranting reconsideration of the AIP role in prostate cancer risk stratification. Results from prospective and molecular studies indicate that AIP frequently coexists with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and shares molecular alterations with IDC, such as PTEN loss and ERG overexpression, reinforcing AIP potential as a marker of occult aggressive disease. Considering the growing emphasis on precision diagnostics and active surveillance in prostate cancer management, understanding the implications of AIP is particularly relevant.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023466497
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-025-01114-7
U2 - 10.1038/s41585-025-01106-7
DO - 10.1038/s41585-025-01106-7
M3 - Review
C2 - 41203847
AN - SCOPUS:105023466497
SN - 1759-4812
JO - Nature Reviews Urology
JF - Nature Reviews Urology
ER -