Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Associations between enteral nutrition and outcomes in the SUP-ICU trial: Results of exploratory post hoc analyses

Mark Borthwick*, Anders Granholm, Søren Marker, Mette Krag, Theis Lange, Matt P Wise, Stepani Bendel, Frederik Keus, Anne Berit Guttormsen, Joerg C Schefold, Jørn Wetterslev, Anders Perner, Morten Hylander Møller

*Corresponding author for this work
4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition may affect risks of gastrointestinal bleeding, pneumonia and mortality in critically ill patients and may also modify the effects of pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis. We undertook post hoc analyses of the stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit trial to assess for any associations and interactions between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole.

METHODS: Extended Cox models with time-varying co-variates and competing events were used to assess potential associations, adjusted for baseline severity of illness. Potential interactions between daily enteral nutrition and allocation to pantoprazole on outcomes were similarly assessed.

RESULTS: Enteral nutrition was associated with lower risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (cause-specific hazard ratio [HR]: 0.29, 95% confidence interval: [CI] 0.19-0.44, p < .001), higher risk of pneumonia (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82, p = .003), and lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.18-0.27, p < .001). Enteral nutrition with allocation to pantoprazole was associated with a lower risk of mortality (HR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.21-0.35, p < .001), similar to enteral nutrition with allocation to placebo (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.13-0.23, p < .001). Allocation to pantoprazole with no enteral nutrition had little effect on mortality (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.63-1.09, p = .179), whilst allocation to pantoprazole and receipt of enteral nutrition was mostly compatible with increased all-cause mortality (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.99-1.64, p = .061). The test of interaction between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole treatment allocation for all-cause mortality was statistically significant (p = .024).

CONCLUSIONS: Enteral nutrition was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia and a reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. The interaction between pantoprazole and enteral nutrition suggesting an increased risk of mortality requires further study.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume68
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1244-1253
Number of pages10
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/therapeutic use
  • Aged
  • Critical Illness
  • Enteral Nutrition/methods
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pantoprazole/therapeutic use
  • Pneumonia/epidemiology
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations between enteral nutrition and outcomes in the SUP-ICU trial: Results of exploratory post hoc analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this