Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Association Between Topical Corticosteroid Use and Type 2 Diabetes in Two European Population-Based Adult Cohorts

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Fatty Liver Among Adolescent Offspring of Women With Type 1 Diabetes (the EPICOM Study)

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Diabetes Distress, Intentional Hyperglycemia at Work, and Glycemic Control Among Workers With Type 1 Diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Polygenic predisposition to breast cancer and the risk of coronary artery disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Cardiovascular Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The Effects of Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonism on Glucagon Secretion-A Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Topical corticosteroids (CSs) are commonly used to treat inflammatory skin conditions including eczema and psoriasis. Although topical CS package inserts describe hyperglycemia and glycosuria as adverse drug reactions, it is unclear whether topical CS use in real life is also associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two matched case-control studies and one cohort study were conducted using routinely collected health care data from Denmark and the U.K. A total of 115,218 and 54,944 adults were identified as case subjects with new-onset T2D in the Danish and U.K. case-control study, respectively. For the Danish cohort study, 2,689,473 adults were included. The main exposure was topical CSs, and the outcome was incident T2D.

RESULTS: Topical CS was significantly associated with T2D in the Danish (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.25 [95% CI 1.23-1.28]) and U.K. (adjusted OR 1.27 [95% CI 1.23-1.31]) case-control studies. Individuals who were exposed to topical CSs had significantly increased risk of incident T2D (adjusted hazard ratio 1.27 [95% CI 1.26-1.29]). We observed significant dose-response relationships between T2D and increasing potency of topical CSs in the two Danish studies. The results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: We found a positive association between topical CS prescribing and incident T2D in Danish and U.K. adult populations. Clinicians should be cognizant of possible diabetogenic effects of potent topical CSs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume42
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1095-1103
Number of pages9
ISSN1935-5548
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

ID: 57063315