Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Assisted versus Manual Interpretation of Low-Dose CT Scans for Lung Cancer Screening: Impact on Lung-RADS Agreement

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Deep Learning for Malignancy Risk Estimation of Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Low-Dose Screening CT

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Clinical Applicability of Lung Ultrasound Methods in the Emergency Department to Detect Pulmonary Congestion on Computed Tomography

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Incidental discovery of multiple tracheal diverticula

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Severe weight loss in young patient with type 1 diabetes and superior mesenteric artery syndrome

    Research output: Other contributionNet publication - Internet publicationCommunication

  • Colin Jacobs
  • Anton Schreuder
  • Sarah J van Riel
  • Ernst Th Scholten
  • Rianne Wittenberg
  • Mathilde M Winkler Wille
  • Bartjan de Hoop
  • Ralf Sprengers
  • Onno M Mets
  • Bram Geurts
  • Mathias Prokop
  • Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
  • Bram van Ginneken
View graph of relations

Purpose To compare the inter- and intraobserver agreement and reading times achieved when assigning Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) categories to baseline and follow-up lung cancer screening studies by using a dedicated CT lung screening viewer with integrated nodule detection and volumetric support with those achieved by using a standard picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-like viewer. Materials and Methods Data were obtained from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). By using data recorded by NLST radiologists, scans were assigned to Lung-RADS categories. For each Lung-RADS category (1 or 2, 3, 4A, and 4B), 40 CT scans (20 baseline scans and 20 follow-up scans) were randomly selected for 160 participants (median age, 61 years; interquartile range, 58-66 years; 61 women) in total. Seven blinded observers independently read all CT scans twice in a randomized order with a 2-week washout period: once by using the standard PACS-like viewer and once by using the dedicated viewer. Observers were asked to assign a Lung-RADS category to each scan and indicate the risk-dominant nodule. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was analyzed by using Fleiss κ values and Cohen weighted κ values, respectively. Reading times were compared by using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results The interobserver agreement was moderate for the standard viewer and substantial for the dedicated viewer, with Fleiss κ values of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.60) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.68), respectively. The intraobserver agreement was substantial, with a mean Cohen weighted κ value of 0.67. The median reading time was significantly reduced from 160 seconds with the standard viewer to 86 seconds with the dedicated viewer (P < .001). Conclusion Lung-RADS interobserver agreement increased from moderate to substantial when using the dedicated CT lung screening viewer. The median reading time was substantially reduced when scans were read by using the dedicated CT lung screening viewer. Keywords: CT, Thorax, Lung, Computer Applications-Detection/Diagnosis, Observer Performance, Technology Assessment Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere200160
JournalRadiology. Imaging cancer
Volume3
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)e200160
ISSN2638-616X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2021

ID: 67834584