Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessment of technical competence in anterolateral buttress plate fixation of tibial plateau fractures: a global Delphi consensus study

Maj Ósk Bruun Stangegård*, Mads Emil Jacobsen, Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Monica Ghidinelli, Chitra Subramaniam, Kristoffer Borbjerg Hare, Lars Konge, Amandus Gustafsson

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tibial plateau fractures often require surgery, where surgeon competence is critical. Competency-based medical education requires valid objective assessment. The purpose of this study was to develop an expert consensus-based, procedure-specific assessment tool to evaluate technical competence in buttress plate fixation of tibial plateau fractures.

METHODS: International orthopaedic trauma educators participated in a four round online Delphi process to establish consensus on the content of the assessment tool. Round 1 identified potential parameters; Round 2 rated importance of each parameter; Round 3 addressed items outside this manuscript; Round 4 assigned weights (1–10).

RESULTS: Eighty-seven surgeons from 42 countries participated. Of 31 parameters identified, five were excluded in Round 2, leaving 26. Parameter weights ranged from 6.8 to 9.6, with anatomical fracture reduction rated highest.

CONCLUSION: The resulting consensus-based assessment tool shows strong content validity and supports structured feedback for formative and summative use in surgical training.

Original languageEnglish
Article number99
JournalEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Volume36
Issue number1
ISSN1633-8065
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Buttress plate
  • Competency-based medical education
  • Delphi
  • Surgical skills
  • Tibial plateau fracture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of technical competence in anterolateral buttress plate fixation of tibial plateau fractures: a global Delphi consensus study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this