Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Assessment of diabetic foot ulcers based on pictorial material: an interobserver study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. FOREWORD

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. SURGICAL SITE INFECTION: PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT ACROSS HEALTH-CARE SECTORS

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Uncontrolled gelatin degradation in non-healing chronic wounds

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Non-antibiotic antimicrobial interventions and antimicrobial stewardship in wound care

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Wound centres-how do we obtain high quality? The EWMA wound centre endorsement project

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: The frequent change in clinicians, and the emerging use of photographic documentation in wound management, could require a more diverse treatment of patients due to poor interobserver agreement. The aim of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement of a commonly used classification system for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), the Meggitt-Wagner classification, and to compare the agreement on classification with the agreement in treatment recommendations.

METHOD: An interobserver study was conducted based on a questionnaire linked to 30 photographs of DFUs. Different groups of observers were tested to investigate whether there was a difference between professions or level of education: experienced orthopaedic wound care doctors (n=7); nurses specialised in wound care (n=8) and untrained nurses assigned to a diabetic wound care training course (n=23). Krippendorff's alpha was used to calculate interobserver agreement, and an agreement of >0.67 was defined as substantial.

RESULTS: The Krippendorff's alpha value for interobserver agreement on the Meggitt-Wagner classification was 0.52 for the doctors group, 0.67 for the specialised nurses and 0.61 for the untrained nurses. The corresponding values regarding agreement on recommendation of surgical revision of the wound were 0.35, 0.22 and 0.15, respectively. The choice of dressing type or antibiotic treatment had even lower interobserver agreement.

CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver agreement on the Meggitt-Wagner classification was substantial in the specialised nurse group, but the evaluation and treatment of DFUs should not be exclusively based on pictorial materials.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of wound care
Volume29
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)658-663
Number of pages6
ISSN0969-0700
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2020

ID: 62384181