Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Assessment of coronary calcification using calibrated mass score with two different multidetector computed tomography scanners in the Copenhagen General Population Study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Classifying radiographic changes of the pubic symphysis in male athletes: Development and reproducibility of a new scoring protocol

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Impact of adding breast density to breast cancer risk models: A systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Combined hyperpolarized C-pyruvate MRS and F-FDG PET (hyperPET) estimates of glycolysis in canine cancer patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Population studies have shown coronary calcium score to improve risk stratification in subjects suspected for cardiovascular disease. The aim of this work was to assess the validity of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for measurement of calibrated mass scores (MS) in a phantom study, and to investigate inter-scanner variability for MS and Agaston score (AS) recorded in a population study on two different high-end MDCT scanners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A calcium phantom was scanned by a first (A) and second (B) generation 320-MDCT. MS was measured for each calcium deposit from repeated measurements in each scanner and compared to known physical phantom mass. Random samples of human subjects from the Copenhagen General Population Study were scanned with scanner A (N=254) and scanner B (N=253) where MS and AS distributions of these two groups were compared.

RESULTS: The mean total MS of the phantom was 32.9±0.8mg and 33.1±0.9mg (p=0.43) assessed by scanner A and B respectively - the physical calcium mass was 34.0mg. Correlation between measured MS and physical calcium mass was R2=0.99 in both scanners. In the population study the median total MS was 16.8mg (interquartile range (IQR): 3.5-81.1) and 15.8mg (IQR: 3.8-63.4) in scanner A and B (p=0.88). The corresponding median total AS were 92 (IQR: 23-471) and 89 (IQR: 40-384) (p=0.64).

CONCLUSION: Calibrated calcium mass score may be assessed with very high accuracy in a calcium phantom by different generations of 320-MDCT scanners. In population studies, it appears acceptable to pool calcium scores acquired on different 320-MDCT scanners.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Pages (from-to)21-25
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Calcinosis, Calibration, Coronary Artery Disease, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multidetector Computed Tomography, Phantoms, Imaging, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed, Journal Article

ID: 52386566