Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging: design and validation of an automated tool

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{5ed4555f5b4e4a71929b851ec986a4db,
title = "Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging: design and validation of an automated tool",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Yield and safety of colonoscopy are highly dependent on operator competence. Existing tools for assessing competence is time-consuming and based on direct observation, making them prone for bias. There is a need for an easily accessible, reliable, and valid measure of endoscopic performance.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and explore the validity of an automated, unbiased assessment tool.DESIGN: We tested 10 experienced endoscopists and 11 trainees in colonoscopy on a physical simulator (Kagaku Colonoscope Training Model). Participants were tested with an easy and a difficult case.SETTING: Center for Clinical Education, Capital Region of Denmark.MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: By using magnetic endoscopic imaging, we developed a colonoscopy progression score (CoPS). A pass/fail score was established by using the contrast-group method.RESULTS: We found significant differences in performance between the 2 groups using the CoPS in both case scenarios (easy: P < .001, difficult: P < .01).LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes. The heterogeneity of the experienced group resulted in a high passing score for the difficult case, which led to the failing of the less experienced in the group. The CoPS does not consider polyp detection rate, tissue damage, or patient discomfort.CONCLUSIONS: We developed a score of progression in colonoscopy, based on magnetic endoscopic imaging. With the same tool, a map of progression in colonoscopy can be provided. The CoPS and map of progression in colonoscopy could, with further development, be a valuable tool in colonoscopy training, providing live feedback and aid in unbiased certification.",
author = "Nikolaj Nerup and Louise Preisler and Svendsen, {Morten Bo S{\o}ndergaard} and Svendsen, {Lars Bo} and Lars Konge",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.019",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "548--54",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby, Inc",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging

T2 - design and validation of an automated tool

AU - Nerup, Nikolaj

AU - Preisler, Louise

AU - Svendsen, Morten Bo Søndergaard

AU - Svendsen, Lars Bo

AU - Konge, Lars

N1 - Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - BACKGROUND: Yield and safety of colonoscopy are highly dependent on operator competence. Existing tools for assessing competence is time-consuming and based on direct observation, making them prone for bias. There is a need for an easily accessible, reliable, and valid measure of endoscopic performance.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and explore the validity of an automated, unbiased assessment tool.DESIGN: We tested 10 experienced endoscopists and 11 trainees in colonoscopy on a physical simulator (Kagaku Colonoscope Training Model). Participants were tested with an easy and a difficult case.SETTING: Center for Clinical Education, Capital Region of Denmark.MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: By using magnetic endoscopic imaging, we developed a colonoscopy progression score (CoPS). A pass/fail score was established by using the contrast-group method.RESULTS: We found significant differences in performance between the 2 groups using the CoPS in both case scenarios (easy: P < .001, difficult: P < .01).LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes. The heterogeneity of the experienced group resulted in a high passing score for the difficult case, which led to the failing of the less experienced in the group. The CoPS does not consider polyp detection rate, tissue damage, or patient discomfort.CONCLUSIONS: We developed a score of progression in colonoscopy, based on magnetic endoscopic imaging. With the same tool, a map of progression in colonoscopy can be provided. The CoPS and map of progression in colonoscopy could, with further development, be a valuable tool in colonoscopy training, providing live feedback and aid in unbiased certification.

AB - BACKGROUND: Yield and safety of colonoscopy are highly dependent on operator competence. Existing tools for assessing competence is time-consuming and based on direct observation, making them prone for bias. There is a need for an easily accessible, reliable, and valid measure of endoscopic performance.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and explore the validity of an automated, unbiased assessment tool.DESIGN: We tested 10 experienced endoscopists and 11 trainees in colonoscopy on a physical simulator (Kagaku Colonoscope Training Model). Participants were tested with an easy and a difficult case.SETTING: Center for Clinical Education, Capital Region of Denmark.MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: By using magnetic endoscopic imaging, we developed a colonoscopy progression score (CoPS). A pass/fail score was established by using the contrast-group method.RESULTS: We found significant differences in performance between the 2 groups using the CoPS in both case scenarios (easy: P < .001, difficult: P < .01).LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes. The heterogeneity of the experienced group resulted in a high passing score for the difficult case, which led to the failing of the less experienced in the group. The CoPS does not consider polyp detection rate, tissue damage, or patient discomfort.CONCLUSIONS: We developed a score of progression in colonoscopy, based on magnetic endoscopic imaging. With the same tool, a map of progression in colonoscopy can be provided. The CoPS and map of progression in colonoscopy could, with further development, be a valuable tool in colonoscopy training, providing live feedback and aid in unbiased certification.

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.019

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.019

M3 - Journal article

VL - 81

SP - 548

EP - 554

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 44954622