Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Assessing competence in cochlear implant surgery using the newly developed Cochlear Implant Surgery Assessment Tool

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Use of simulation-based training of surgical technical skills among ENTs: an international YO-IFOS survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. COVID-19 infection rate among tertiary referral center otorhinolaryngology healthcare workers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Content validity evidence for a simulation-based test of handheld otoscopy skills

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. The learning curve of robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery - A randomized trial in a simulated setting

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Use of simulation-based training of surgical technical skills among ENTs: an international YO-IFOS survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. 3D-Printed Models for Temporal Bone Surgical Training: A Systematic Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: To develop and gather validity evidence for a novel tool for assessment of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, including virtual reality CI surgery training.

METHODS: Prospective study gathering validity evidence according to Messick's framework. Four experts developed the CI Surgery Assessment Tool (CISAT). A total of 35 true novices (medical students), trained novices (residents) and CI surgeons performed two CI-procedures each in the Visible Ear Simulator, which were rated by three blinded experts. Classical test theory and generalizability theory were used for reliability analysis.

RESULTS: The CISAT significantly discriminated between the three groups (p < 0.001). The generalizability coefficient was 0.76 and most of the score variance (53.3%) was attributable to the participant and only 6.8% to the raters. When exploring a standard setting for CI surgery, the contrasting groups method suggested a pass/fail score of 36.0 points (out of 55), but since the trained novices performed above this, we propose using the mean CI surgeon performance score (45.3 points).

CONCLUSION: Validity evidence for simulation-based assessment of CI performance supports the CISAT. Together with the standard setting, the CISAT might be used to monitor progress in competency-based training of CI surgery and to determine when the trainee can advance to further training.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN0003-9195
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Feb 2021

    Research areas

  • Cochlear implants, Medical education, Resident education, Virtual reality

ID: 62375321