Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Assessing assumptions for statistical analyses in randomised clinical trials

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Was amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate adequately evaluated before authorisation in Europe?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Methylphenidate for ADHD rejected from the WHO Essential Medicines List due to uncertainties in benefit-harm profile

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Assessment of assumptions of statistical analysis methods in randomised clinical trials: the what and how

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Blinding in randomised clinical trials of psychological interventions: a retrospective study of published trial reports

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Considerations on the strengths and limitations of using disease-related mortality as an outcome in clinical research

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Biomarkers of brain injury after cardiac arrest; a statistical analysis plan from the TTM2 trial biobank investigators

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Long-term outcomes of dexamethasone 12 mg versus 6 mg in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

In order to ensure the validity of results of randomised clinical trials and under some circumstances to optimise statistical power, most statistical methods require validation of underlying statistical assumptions. The present paper describes how trialists in major medical journals report tests of underlying statistical assumptions when analysing results of randomised clinical trials. We also consider possible solutions how to improve current practice by adequate reporting of tests of underlying statistical assumptions. We conclude that there is a need to reach consensus on which underlying assumptions should be assessed, how these underlying assumptions should be assessed and what should be done if the underlying assumptions are violated.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume24
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)185-189
Number of pages5
ISSN1356-5524
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2019

ID: 56951368