Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Are theory of mind and bullying separately associated with later academic performance among preadolescents?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Effectiveness of cognitive remediation in the ultra-high risk state for psychosis

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  2. Psychotic experiences from preadolescence to adolescence: when should we be worried about adolescent risk behaviors?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The autism diagnostic observation schedule: Patterns in individuals with anorexia nervosa

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Associations between facial affect recognition and neurocognition in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis: A case-control study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Bullying and poor theory of mind (ToM) are both considered to negatively impact academic performance. However, it is unclear if they have separate effects.

AIM: The aim of the current study was to examine the potentially separate associations of bullying and ToM with academic performance.

SAMPLE: A general population sample of 1,170 children aged 11-12 years.

METHODS: Information on bullying, type of involvement (none, victim (only), bully (only), victim-bully (both)), ToM, and estimated intelligence was obtained at face-to-face assessments. Information on academic performance was obtained from Danish school registers.

RESULTS: ToM was positively associated with academic performance, and involvement in bullying was negatively associated with academic performance. Academic performance differed between types of involvement in bullying. Pairwise post hoc analyses showed that in the full sample, the only significant difference was between those not involved and those involved as victim (only). This was also the case for girls. Adjusting for potential shared variance with gender, estimated intelligence and ToM being victim (only) and victim-bully (both) were negatively associated with academic performance compared to no involvement. Thus, being a victim (or victim-bully) contributes negatively to academic performance beyond the effects of ToM and intelligence, and regardless of gender. Similarly, ToM remained positively associated with academic performance after adjusting for shared variance.

CONCLUSION: ToM and involvement in bullying were both separately associated with later academic performance. These results remained even after adjusting for shared variance, and for shared variance with gender and estimated IQ.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe British journal of educational psychology
Number of pages15
ISSN0007-0998
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

ID: 56109892