Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence compared with the general population: a valid comparison?

M Groenvold, P M Fayers, M A Sprangers, J B Bjorner, M C Klee, N K Aaronson, P Bech, H T Mouridsen

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Breast cancer and its treatment have been associated with psychological morbidity. In this study our aim was to quantify the excess anxiety and depression resulting from breast cancer. We compared 538 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence (87.0% responded) to 872 women randomly selected from the Danish general population (69.7% responded) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Contrary to expectations, the proportions classified as "cases" of anxiety and depression were not significantly different in the two groups. The breast cancer patients' mean HADS scores were significantly lower than those in the general population sample (anxiety, P = 0.021; depression, P < 0.001), indicating less anxiety and depression. However, we question the validity of this comparison. The HADS may not be suitable for use in the general population and there may be methodological problems in comparisons of groups whose life situations are very different.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume52
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)523-30
Number of pages8
ISSN0895-4356
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Age Distribution
  • Aged
  • Anxiety/epidemiology
  • Breast Neoplasms/psychology
  • Denmark/epidemiology
  • Depression/epidemiology
  • Epidemiologic Research Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Personality Inventory
  • Recurrence
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Factors
  • Selection Bias

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence compared with the general population: a valid comparison?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this