Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Ambiguous expectations for intersectoral action for health: a document analysis of the Danish case

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. (Re)framing school as a setting for promoting health and well-being: a double translation process

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The (failed) promise of intersectoral working groups and other rituals in Scandinavian public health

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

  3. Risk, the prediabetes diagnosis and preventive strategies: critical insights from a qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The spirit of the intervention: reflections on social effectiveness in public Health intervention research

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. 'Standing together - at a distance': Documenting changes in mental-health indicators in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Towards a syndemic public health response to COVID-19

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  3. Vi trænger til en dosis verdenssind

    Research output: Contribution to journalContribution to newspaper - Comment/debate

  4. Ulighed i sundhed skal bekæmpes med bredt sammensatte partnerskaber

    Research output: Contribution to journalContribution to newspaper - Comment/debate

View graph of relations

Ideas about intersectoral action and policy-making for health (ISA) are prominent among public health professionals. They are often presented as effective ways to address root causes of poor health and health inequality, and as such the best way to promote population health. The implementation of such ideas has proven difficult though. In this paper we argue that neo-institutional theory can help us conceptualize implementation challenges by pointing to implicit expectations and contradictions associated with the ISA idea itself. With Denmark as empirical case, we conducted a document analysis of recommendations for municipal ISA. The analysis shows how the recommendations provide a very abstract conceptualization of ISA that does not give much practical guidance for action. We show how ISA is discursively constructed with buzzword qualities as the natural way to organize health promotion, by being presented as a means to produce better quality services, more cost-effective operations and ensure the future of the welfare state, while at the same time hardly changing much at all. By applying the lens of institutional logics we show how ISA, although being vaguely defined, offer ambiguous normative and symbolic repertoires for action. We discuss the implementation challenges associated with this advocacy rhetoric and suggest that the domination of the corporation logic may appear to reduce the political character of ISA and potentially conflict with the ideals of health as a matter of social justice and human rights.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCritical Public Health
Volume28
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)35-47
Number of pages13
ISSN0958-1596
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • governance, Intersectoral action for health, municipal health promotion

ID: 57247646