Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Adductor canal block with a suture-method catheter - A parallel or perpendicular approach?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Impact of Physician-staffed Helicopters on Pre-hospital Patient Outcomes: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Hypothermic to ischemic ratio and mortality in post-cardiac arrest patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Response letter to comments made by J. G. Förster, M. Pitkänen

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  1. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of selective axillary nerve block after arthroscopic subacromial decompression

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The association between epidural analgesia and mortality in emergency abdominal surgery: A population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Volume of ropivacaine 0.2% and sciatic nerve block duration:a randomised, blinded trial inhealthy volunteers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: We performed a randomised blinded pilot study in 16 healthy volunteers to assess whether placing a suture-method catheter in the adductor canal is feasible with two different insertion techniques.

METHODS: Each volunteer had a suture-method catheter placed approximately halfway between the superior anterior iliac spine and base of the patella in both legs. Catheters were placed using a parallel technique in one leg and a perpendicular technique in the other leg, according to randomisation. 15 mL lidocaine 1% was injected in each catheter. Successful placement was defined as loss of cold sensation in the saphenous area 30 min after injection. Volunteers were sent home and returned the following day and another dose of lidocaine (15 mL, 1%) was injected through the catheters. Catheter displacement distance was assessed by ultrasound and cold sensation was assessed. In case of preserved cold sensation, we attempted to reposition the catheter with a subsequent injection of lidocaine and reassessment of cold sensation.

RESULTS: All primary placements were successful using the perpendicular approach (100%; 95% CI 81%-100%) whereas one placement failed using the parallel approach (94%; 95% CI 72%-99%). Three catheters placed using the perpendicular approach were displaced on day 2, compared to one catheter placed with the parallel approach. Displacement distance was highly variable. All catheters, except one, could be repositioned. Three volunteers reported transient sensory deficits lasting approximately 6-8 weeks.

CONCLUSION: The suture-method catheter can be placed in the adductor canal with high success rates for initial placement with both techniques.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume63
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)523-530
Number of pages8
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

ID: 58227384