Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adaptive designs in randomized clinical trials: reanalysis of the HOVON87/NMSG18 multiple myeloma trial

Maarten R. Seefat, Niek G. van der Maas, Kazem Nasserinejad, Bronno van der Holt, Anders Waage, Ulf Henrik Mellqvist, Annette Juul Vangsted, Anna J.T. Smit, Febe Smits, Paula F. Ypma, Niels W.C.J. van de Donk, Hedwig M. Blommestein, Jan J. Cornelissen, David G.J. Cucchi, Sonja Zweegman, Jurjen Versluis*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Background: Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard to assess clinical efficacy of novel drugs, but improved survival extends follow-up time and challenges their feasibility. Adaptive trial designs, offering earlier outcome assessments, may enhance efficiency and accelerate decision-making. We retrospectively evaluated whether applying adaptive designs to the randomized HOVON87/NMSG18 phase III trial (inclusion between January 2009 and October 2012), which failed to meet its primary endpoint, could have indicated futility earlier. Methods: We modelled two adaptive trial designs: (1) group sequential and (2) sample size re-estimation. Each design recommends early trial termination for strong efficacy or futility, or continuation if signals are inconclusive. Interim analyses for the group sequential design were defined at 33% and 67% of events required for the final analysis, using O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, and gamma spending functions to control for false positive or negative results. Sample size re-estimation design was evaluated after 67% of events. Findings: Group sequential design: Hazard ratios (HRs) at both interim analyses were within futility/efficacy boundaries with the more conservative O'Brien-Fleming and gamma spending functions, indicating trial continuation as planned. However, the more aggressive Pocock spending function indicated trial termination at the second interim analysis with a HR of 0.88 exceeding the futility boundary of HR > 0.85. Sample size re-estimation design: At 67% of events, the observed HR of 0.86 was in the unfavourable zone, whereas the promising zone required a HR between ≥0.76 and ≤0.83. The observed HR indicated trial continuation without sample size expansion. Interpretation: This reanalysis of a MM trial suggests that adaptive designs indicate earlier futility detection and thereby facilitate decision-making. Early signals could reduce follow-up time or potentially offer sample size expansion if the effect is promising but not yet conclusive. Our findings highlight the value of implementing adaptive designs to enhance the efficiency and ethical conduct of future RCTs. Funding: The HOVON87/NMSG18 trial was supported by Dutch Cancer Society grant2008-4246, the Norwegian Cancer Society and Celgene.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103605
JournalEClinicalMedicine
Volume90
ISSN2589-5370
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Adaptive trial designs
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Randomized clinical trials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adaptive designs in randomized clinical trials: reanalysis of the HOVON87/NMSG18 multiple myeloma trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this