Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Adaptations and modifications to a co-designed intervention and its clinical implementation: a qualitative study in Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: There is a long-standing debate in implementation research on whether adaptations to evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are desirable in health care. If an intervention is adapted and not delivered as conceived and planned, it is said to have low fidelity. The WALK-Cph project was developed based on the assumption that involving stakeholders in co-design processes would facilitate the fidelity of an intervention to increase the mobility of acutely admitted older medical patients and its implementation in two hospitals in Denmark. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyse adaptations and modifications that were made to the co-designed WALK-Cph intervention and its implementation.

METHODS: This study used a qualitative design. An ethnographic field study was performed using participant observations, workshops and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed twice using the Framework Method. The first analysis was based on the frameworks from Stirman, Moore and Proctor. The second analysis, a retrospective modifications analysis, was based on the Adaptation-Impact Framework.

RESULTS: Many different types of adaptations and modifications were made to the WALK-Cph intervention and its implementation plan. Most of the modifications were made on the contents of the intervention. In total, 44 adaptations and modifications were made, of which 21 were planned (adaptations) and 23 were made haphazardly (modifications). Most of the content and context adaptations and modifications made on the intervention had a mixed result regarding enhanced fidelity. The retrospective modifications analysis showed that modifications were ongoing and both situationally and contextually shaped.

CONCLUSIONS: Although an extensive co-design process was carried out to facilitate the fidelity of the WALK-Cph intervention, this study showed that many adaptations and modifications were still made to both the intervention and its implementation plan. It could indicate that the co-design process had a small effect or that adaptations and modifications are ongoing and both situationally and contextually shaped, which challenge the assumption and the desire to be able to plan and control changes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1108
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume21
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
ISSN1472-6963
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

© 2021. The Author(s).

    Research areas

  • Delivery of Health Care, Denmark, Humans, Qualitative Research, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Modification, Qualitative methods, Evidence-based interventions, Non-conscious processes, Adaptation

ID: 68557703