Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Acute pain management in burn patients: appraisal and thematic analysis of four clinical guidelines

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Endothelial glycocalyx shedding in patients with burns

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Management of bleeding in major burn surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Optimization of burn referrals

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The 101 percent in Lund-Browder charts - A commentary

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Hejdi Gamst-Jensen
  • Pernille Nygaard Vedel
  • Viktoria Oline Lindberg-Larsen
  • Ingrid Egerod
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Burn patients suffer excruciating pain due to their injuries and procedures related to surgery, wound care, and mobilization. Acute Stress Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, chronic pain and depression are highly prevalent among survivors of severe burns. Evidence-based pain management addresses and alleviates these complications. The aim of our study was to compare clinical guidelines for pain management in burn patients in selected European and non-European countries. We included pediatric guidelines due to the high rate of children in burn units.

METHOD: The study had a comparative retrospective design using combined methodology of instrument appraisal and thematic analysis. Three investigators appraised guidelines from burn units in Denmark (DK), Sweden (SE), New Zealand (NZ), and USA using the AGREE Instrument (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation), version II, and identified core themes in the guidelines.

RESULTS: The overall scores expressing quality in six domains of the AGREE instrument were variable at 22% (DK), 44% (SE), 100% (NZ), and 78% (USA). The guidelines from NZ and USA were highly recommended, the Swedish was recommended, whereas the Danish was not recommended. The identified core themes were: continuous pain, procedural pain, postoperative pain, pain assessment, anxiety, and non-pharmacological interventions.

CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated variability in quality, transparency, and core content in clinical guidelines on pain management in burn patients. The most highly recommended guidelines provided clear and accurate recommendations for the nursing and medical staff on pain management in burn patients. We recommend the use of a validated appraisal tool such as the AGREE instrument to provide more consistent and evidence-based care to burn patients in the clinic, to unify guideline construction, and to enable interdepartmental comparison of treatment and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
Volume40
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1463-9
Number of pages7
ISSN0305-4179
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

ID: 44954738