Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Acute myocardial infarction in relation to physical activities at work: a nationwide follow-up study based on job-exposure matrices

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  1. How to schedule night shift work in order to reduce health and safety risks

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. On endocrine disruption at the workplace - how to get from suggestive to conclusive evidence?

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

  3. Influence of errors in job codes on job exposure matrix-based exposure assessment in the register-based occupational cohort DOC*X

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Natarbejde og komplikationer i graviditeten

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  2. Maternal life and work stressors during pregnancy and asthma in offspring

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Objective This study aimed to evaluate sex-specific risks of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) according to lifting and standing/walking at work. Methods The study population included 1.15 million Danish wage earners. Annual job codes from 1976 onwards were linked to specific exposures using job-exposure matrices (JEM). Cases of AMI during follow-up 1996-2016 were retrieved from national registers. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were computed by Poisson regression adjusting for demographic and JEM-assessed lifestyle factors. Models addressed physical activities at work the previous 0-2 years (short-term risk) and cumulative physical activities (long-term risk). Results During 21.4 million person-years of follow-up, 22 037 AMI occurred in men and 6942 in women. Exposure-response relationships between recent physical activities at work and AMI were not evident. In men, the fully adjusted long-term IRR for the highest of five exposure categories compared to the lowest were 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.15] for lifting and 1.01 (95% CI 0.96-1.07) for standing/walking. In women, the corresponding figures were 1.27 (95% CI 1.15-1.40) and 1.18 (95% CI 1.07-1.30). The latter risk estimate was strongly attenuated, and the trend became insignificant when adjusted for lifting. Findings were only partially supported by sensitivity analyses. Conclusion The study provides limited support to the hypothesis that long-term lifting and standing/walking at work is related to increased risk of AMI. Possible effects of acute physical exertion are not addressed and bias towards the null because of crude exposure assignment cannot be ruled out.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)268-277
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2020

    Research areas

  • Cohort study, Epidemiology, Heart disease, Heavy lifting, JEM, Occupation, Standing, Strenuous work, Walking

ID: 58403843