Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

ACE genotype, phenotype and all-cause mortality in different cohorts of patients with type 1 diabetes

Louise H Færch, Anne-Sophie Sejling, Maria Lajer, Lise Tarnow, Birger Thorsteinsson, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aims:Carrying the D-allele of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) I/D polymorphism and high ACE activity are prognostic factors in diabetic nephropathy, which predicts mortality in type 1 diabetes. We studied the association between the ACE D-allele and ACE phenotype and long-term all-cause mortality in three single-institution outpatient cohorts.

    METHODS: Genotype-based analyses were performed in 269 patients from Hillerød Hospital (HIH) (follow-up: 12 years) and in 439 patients with diabetic nephropathy and 437 patients with persistent normoalbuminuria from the Steno Diabetes Center (SDC) (follow-up: 9.5 years). Patients not on renin-angiotensin system (RAS)-blocking treatment were included in analyses of serum ACE activity (HIH: n = 208) and plasma ACE concentration (SDC: n=269).

    RESULTS: In the HIH cohort, carrying a D-allele was associated with excess mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-16)), but not in the SDC cohorts. At HIH, serum ACE activity was associated with excess mortality (HR=1.04 (95% CI 1.0-1.1 per unit increase)), but in the SDC cohort plasma ACE concentration was not.

    CONCLUSION: In unselected patients with type 1 diabetes, carrying the ACE D-allele and high spontaneous serum ACE activity were associated with 12-year excess mortality. These findings could not be reproduced in two other cohorts with persistent normoalbuminuria or diabetic nephropathy.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS
    Volume16
    Pages (from-to)374-81
    ISSN1470-3203
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'ACE genotype, phenotype and all-cause mortality in different cohorts of patients with type 1 diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this