Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Absorbable Meshes in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. High-Throughput Sequencing-Based Investigation of Viruses in Human Cancers by Multienrichment Approach

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Adverse reactions of dimethyl sulfoxide in humans: a systematic review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. A national center for persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair: Five-year prospective data

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Response to Comment on "Polypropylene Mesh and Fertility"

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Groin hernia in children

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Absorbable meshes used in inguinal hernia repair are believed to result in less chronic pain than permanent meshes, but concerns remain whether absorbable meshes result in an increased risk of recurrence. The aim of this study was to present an overview of the advantages and limitations of fully absorbable meshes for the repair of inguinal hernias, focusing mainly on postoperative pain and recurrence.

METHODS: This systematic review with meta-analyses is based on searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Psychinfo. Included study designs were case series, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and non-RCTs. Studies had to include adult patients undergoing an inguinal hernia repair with a fully absorbable mesh.

RESULTS: The meta-analyses showed no difference in recurrence rates (median 18 months follow-up) and chronic pain rates (1 year follow-up) between absorbable- and permanent meshes. Crude chronic pain rates for the RCTs were 2.1% for the absorbable meshes and 7.6% for the permanent meshes. For the absorbable meshes, medial hernias were more susceptible for recurrence compared with lateral hernias ( P < .0005). None of the studies reported allergic reactions or other serious adverse events related to the absorbable mesh.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an absorbable mesh seem to have less chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery compared with permanent meshes, without increased risk of recurrence.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSurgical Innovation
Volume24
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)289-298
Number of pages10
ISSN1553-3506
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 51710463