Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

A systematic review of studies on the faecal microbiota in anorexia nervosa: future research may need to include microbiota from the small intestine

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Eating disorder severity and functional impairment: moderating effects of illness duration in a clinical sample

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Slim-elskende bakterier fra frisk lort kan måske hjælpe anoreksi-patienter

    Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewCommunication

  2. Dysbiosis of the Microbiota in Anorexia Nervosa: Pathophysiological Implications

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

  3. Stressfraktur i bilateral rami hos en kvinde med anorexia nervosa

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The Diagnostic Work-Up of Body Dysmorphic Disorder

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Adjunctive dabigatran therapy improves outcome of experimental left-sided Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a poorly understood and often chronic condition. Deviations in the gut microbiota have been reported to influence the gut-brain axis in other disorders. Therefore, if present in AN, it may impact on symptoms and illness progression. A review of the gut microbiota studies in AN is presented.

METHOD: A literature search on PubMed yielded 27 articles; 14 were selected and based on relevance, 9 articles were included. The findings were interpreted in the larger context of preclinical research and clinical observations.

RESULTS: 8 out of 9 included studies analysed microbiota from faeces samples, while the last analysed a protein in plasma produced by the gut. Two studies were longitudinal and included an intervention (i.e., weight restoration), five were cross-sectional, one was a case report, and the last was a case series consisting of three cases. Deviations in abundance, diversity, and microbial composition of the faecal microbiota in AN were found.

CONCLUSION: There are currently only a few studies on the gut microbiota in AN, all done on faeces samples, and not all describe the microbiota at the species level extensively. The Archaeon Methanobrevibacter smithii was increased in participants with a BMI < 25 in one study and specifically in AN patients in three studies. Methanobrevibacter smithii may, if detected, be a benchmark biomarker for future studies. We propose that microbiota samples could also be collected from the small intestine, where a major exchange of nutrients takes place and where the microbiota may have a biological impact on AN.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEating and Weight Disorders
Volume23
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)399-418
ISSN1124-4909
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article, Review

ID: 53439416