Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

A free and simple computerized screening test for visual field defects

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. What brings meaning to life in a highly secular society? A study on sources of meaning among Danes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Cognitive, Emotional and Social Development in Adolescents Born to Substance Using Women

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Visual processing speed in old age

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate: A nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Frequency and immunophenotype of IL10-producing regulatory B cells in optic neuritis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The role of gluten in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Treatment escalation leads to fewer relapses compared with switching to another moderately effective therapy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: A clinical and MRI challenge

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

About 30-40% of stroke patients suffer from visual field defects following injury. These can interfere with the standard neuropsychological assessment and complicate the interpretation of tests that use visual materials. However, information about the integrity of a patient's central visual field is often unavailable. We, therefore, designed a screening tool, the computerized visual field test (c-VFT), specifically targeted at providing easily available, but rough, information about patients' central visual field. c-VFT was tested in two samples of stroke patients. Eleven patients were tested on c-VFT and on the Esterman test. Five patients were tested on c-VFT and the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (HFA), central 10-2. Criterion validity of the c-VFT was investigated by calculating quadrantwise intraclass correlation for both comparisons. For the HFA comparison, we also calculated point-to-point intraclass correlation, sensitivity, and specificity. Analyses revealed moderately good correspondence between c-VFT and the Esterman test, and between c-VFT and HFA 10-2, respectively. When looking specifically at test points within one degree of visual angle apart in the two tests, intraclass correlation increased. For these points, the sensitivity of c-VFT was 0.89 and specificity was 0.97. While the c-VFT is not designed to be diagnostic nor to replace the detailed visual field analysis, this study shows that it provides a reasonable screening of the central visual field. The test can easily be used and will be made freely available to neuropsychological clinicians and researchers.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Psychology
Volume60
Pages (from-to)289
Number of pages6
ISSN0036-5564
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

ID: 57307640