Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

A composite role of vitronectin and urokinase in the modulation of cell morphology upon expression of the urokinase receptor

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  1. Personalized B cell response to the Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG probiotic in healthy human subjects: a randomized trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Tumor cell MT1-MMP is dispensable for osteosarcoma tumor growth, bone degradation and lung metastasis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Chylomicronemia From GPIHBP1 Autoantibodies Successfully Treated With Rituximab: A Case Report

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Chylomicronemia from GPIHBP1 autoantibodies

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  5. Granzyme B Degraded Type IV Collagen Products in Serum Identify Melanoma Patients Responding to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

The urokinase receptor, urokinase receptor (uPAR), is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane protein engaged in pericellular proteolysis and cellular adhesion, migration, and modulation of cell morphology. A direct matrix adhesion is mediated through the binding of uPAR to vitronectin, and this event is followed by downstream effects including changes in the cytoskeletal organization. However, it remains unclear whether the adhesion through uPAR-vitronectin is the only event capable of initiating these morphological rearrangements or whether lateral interactions between uPAR and integrins can induce the same response. In this report, we show that both of these triggering mechanisms can be operative and that uPAR-dependent modulation of cell morphology can indeed occur independently of a direct vitronectin binding. Expression of wild-type uPAR on HEK293 cells led to pronounced vitronectin adhesion and cytoskeletal rearrangements, whereas a mutant uPAR, uPAR(W32A) with defective vitronectin binding, failed to induce both phenomena. However, upon saturation of uPAR(W32A) with the protease ligand, pro-uPA, or its receptor-binding domain, the ability to induce cytoskeletal rearrangements was restored, although this did not rescue the uPAR-vitronectin binding and adhesion capability. On the other hand, using other uPAR variants, we could show that uPAR-vitronectin adhesion is indeed capable and sufficient to induce the same morphological rearrangements. This was shown with cells expressing a different single-site mutant, uPAR(Y57A), in the presence of a synthetic uPAR-binding peptide, as well as with wild-type uPAR, which underwent cytoskeletal rearrangements even when cultivated in uPA-deficient serum. Blocking of integrins with an Arg-Gly-Asp-containing peptide counteracted the matrix contacts necessary to initiate the uPAR-dependent cytoskeletal rearrangements, whereas inactivation of the Rac signaling pathway in all cases suppressed the occurrence of the same events.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe journal of biological chemistry
Issue number22
Pages (from-to)15217-23
Number of pages7
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2008

    Research areas

  • Amino Acid Substitution, Cell Adhesion, Cell Line, Cell Movement, Cell Shape, Cytoskeleton, Humans, Integrins, Peptides, Protein Binding, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Receptors, Cell Surface, Receptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator, Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator, Vitronectin

ID: 46435908