Abstract
In patients with sick sinus syndrome, bradycardia can be treated with a single-lead pacemaker or a dual-chamber pacemaker. Previous trials have revealed that pacing modes preserving atrio-ventricular synchrony are superior to single-lead ventricular pacing, but it remains unclear if there is any difference between single-lead atrial pacing (AAIR) and dual-chamber pacing (DDDR).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | European Heart Journal (English Edition) |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 686-96 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISSN | 0195-668X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
- Cardiotonic Agents
- Cause of Death
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Pacemaker, Artificial
- Reoperation
- Sick Sinus Syndrome
- Stroke
- Treatment Outcome
- Young Adult
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS