Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) locating hyperfunctioning glands (HPGs) is crucial when planning minimally invasive surgery. Dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy with 99mTc-MIBI/123Iodide using SPECT/CT and planar pinhole imaging (Method A) has previously shown a sensitivity >93%. However, the method is costly and time consuming and entails a high radiation dose. 11C-Choline PET/CT (Method B) is an appealing candidate method unencumbered by these disadvantages.
METHODS: Sixty patients with newly diagnosed PHPT participated and were scanned using both methods prior to parathyroidectomy. We investigated whether sensitivities of Method A and Method B are similar in a method-to-method comparison when using surgical findings as the true location.
RESULTS: At the patient level, sensitivities were (A) 0.98 (95% CI: 0.90-1.00) and (B) 1.00 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00). At the gland level, sensitivities were (A) 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78-0.94) and (B) 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76-0.92). With a non-inferiority margin of ∆ = -0.1, we found a 1-sided p-value < 0.001.
CONCLUSION: Our methods comparison study found that sensitivity of Method B was not inferior to Method A. We suggest that 11C-Choline PET/CT is a clinically relevant first-choice candidate for preoperative imaging of PHPT and that Method B can likely replace Method A in the near future.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Diagnostics |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 11 |
ISSN | 2075-4418 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 19 Nov 2020 |
Keywords
- prospective cohort
- primary hyperparathyroidism
- method comparison
- Choline PET
- MIBI-subtraction SPECT
- non-inferiority
- clinical trial