Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Imagery Rehearsal Therapy Groups

Project: Types of projects

View graph of relations
Sleep disturbances are viewed as a hallmark symptom of PTSD and as many as 70 -87% of people suffering from PTSD describe sleep disturbances. Moreover, sleep disturbances might be a risk factor for poor outcome of PTSD treatment since poor sleep may obstruct PTSD patients’ ability to engage in and benefit from first-line PTSD treatment. Furthermore, sleep disturbances have been found to be a residual symptom after various kinds of PTSD treatments. There is therefore a great need for research examining how we can include treatment of sleep disturbances and nightmares to standard treatment of PTSD. Imagery Rehearsal Therapy (IRT) is one of few therapeutic methods developed specifically to target and treat patients suffering from nightmares and sleep disturbances and is designed for group treatment. Contrary to many first-line PTSD treatment methods IRT is not a trauma focused treatment method and it minimizes exposure to trauma content. IRT was selected for this study to offer a treatment method that minimizes exposure and trauma focus, hoping that a greater number of PTSD patients would be capable and willing to engage in IRT group treatment. IRT has been tested on diverse PTSD patient groups, such as amongst veterans and sexual assault victims, showing promising results in treating posttraumatic nightmares and sleep disturbances. These findings sparked an interest ininvestigating if this method could be used for the two selected groups of PTSD patients: Migrant patients being treated at CTP and non-migrant patients being treated at DP. To the knowledge of the author no research exists comparing two groups of patients with PTSD receiving group IRT. The overall aim of the current study is to 1) determine if IRT group treatment is an acceptable treatment method for the two groups of PTSD patients. The second aim is to 2) examine the patients’ experiences through IRT by measuring changes to different parameters of nightmare frequency, nightmare distress, nightmare themes, dream activity and homework practice reported by the patients on a sleep log and group parameters rated by the IRT therapists. The third aim is to 3) monitor indicators of effect of IRT by examine if changes can be detected in; patients’ sleep quality, PTSD symptoms, level of functioning and overall life quality through standardized ratings before, in the middle of and after IRT. The fourth and last aim of the study is to 4) compare the data of the two patient groups.
MethodsNumber of participants (N): IRT treatment groups with 4 to 8 patients pr. group is established in each of the two clinics. At CTP there will be one group for women and one for men and at DP one IRT group of both women and men. Hence the number of patients in the study may vary from 12 to 24 depending on the size of the groups.
Population: Migrant patients being treated at CTP and non-migrant patients being treated at DP. 
Description of data and data collection: This pilot study sets out to determine if IRT in a group setting is an acceptable treatment method for patients suffering from PTSD with related nightmares and sleep disturbances as the first aim. This is done by monitoring indicators of acceptability: attendance, homework practice monitored individually as well as the group session ratings described above. Additionally, acceptability of IRT will also be discussed during evaluation. The second aim to examine the patients’ experiences through IRT including changes on parameters ofnightmare frequency, nightmare distress, nightmare themes, dream activity and homework practice which is measured by the sleep log and noted on the CRF during every session as well as the group parameters rated by the IRT therapists. The third aim is answered through standardized ratings to examine if changes can be detected in; patients’ sleep quality, PTSD symptoms, level of functioning and overall life quality before, mid and after IRT treatment. Finally, the fourth aim is to carry out a number of comparisons between the two patient groups’ in relation to acceptability (attendance, homework practice as well as the group session ratings), the patients experiences with the IRT group (including changes on parameters of nightmare frequency, nightmare distress, nightmare themes, dream activity measured by the sleep log) and the pre, mid and port IRTratings. These comparisons will be qualitative due to the small number of participants.

It is expected that the IRT group format will be acceptable for most patients and that most patients will experience improvement to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress and changes to nightmare themes and dream activity. Indications of a positive effect on sleep quality, PTSD symptoms, level of functioning and overall life quality is expected. It is also expected that the study will find differences between the two groups of the migrant patients and non migrant patients in relation to group dynamics.
StatusCurrent
Period01/04/201801/04/2025

ID: 59656309