Why epidemiological and clinical intervention studies often give different or diverging results?

Henrik E Poulsen; Jon Traerup Andersen; Niels Keiding; Tina Ken Schramm; Rikke Sørensen; Gunnar Gislason; Emil Loldrup Fosbøl; Christian Torp-Pedersen

doi:10.1002/iub.141

Why epidemiological and clinical intervention studies often give different or diverging results?

Henrik E Poulsen, Jon Traerup Andersen, Niels Keiding, Tina Ken Schramm, Rikke Sørensen, Gunnar Gislason, Emil Loldrup Fosbøl, Christian Torp-Pedersen

3 Citationer (Scopus)

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	I U B M B Life
Vol/bind	61
Udgave nummer	4
Sider (fra-til)	391-3
Antal sider	3
ISSN	1521-6543
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.141
Status	Udgivet - 1 apr. 2009

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1002/iub.141

Citationsformater

@article{dfd94506fbe848d0bace0c1a478cdb66,

title = "Why epidemiological and clinical intervention studies often give different or diverging results?",

author = "Poulsen, {Henrik E} and Andersen, {Jon Traerup} and Niels Keiding and Schramm, {Tina Ken} and Rikke S{\o}rensen and Gunnar Gislason and Fosb{\o}l, {Emil Loldrup} and Christian Torp-Pedersen",

year = "2009",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/iub.141",

language = "English",

volume = "61",

pages = "391--3",

journal = "I U B M B Life",

issn = "1521-6543",