Abstract
Many individuals diagnosed with psychosis make multiple attempts to discontinue antipsychotic medications. In this clinical challenge, we examine three snapshots in which shared decision-making (SDM) breaks down due to ongoing disagreement between the service user and the health care provider. We offer three perspectives on how to think about such disagreement: philosophical, psychological, and psychiatric perspectives. Finally, we propose shared deliberation as a potential model for when SDM fails, emphasizing an iterative process of mutual value sharing that avoids binary yes/no responses.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Harvard Review of Psychiatry |
| Vol/bind | 33 |
| Udgave nummer | 3 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 170-177 |
| Antal sider | 8 |
| ISSN | 1067-3229 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 9 maj 2025 |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'When Shared Decision-Making Breaks Down: Solving Moral Dilemmas in Antipsychotic Deprescribing'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS