Spring til hovednavigation Spring til søgning Spring til hovedindhold

When Shared Decision-Making Breaks Down: Solving Moral Dilemmas in Antipsychotic Deprescribing

  • Helene Speyer*
  • , Ju Zhang
  • , John Lysaker
  • , David Roe
  • *Corresponding author af dette arbejde
4 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Many individuals diagnosed with psychosis make multiple attempts to discontinue antipsychotic medications. In this clinical challenge, we examine three snapshots in which shared decision-making (SDM) breaks down due to ongoing disagreement between the service user and the health care provider. We offer three perspectives on how to think about such disagreement: philosophical, psychological, and psychiatric perspectives. Finally, we propose shared deliberation as a potential model for when SDM fails, emphasizing an iterative process of mutual value sharing that avoids binary yes/no responses.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHarvard Review of Psychiatry
Vol/bind33
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)170-177
Antal sider8
ISSN1067-3229
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 9 maj 2025

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'When Shared Decision-Making Breaks Down: Solving Moral Dilemmas in Antipsychotic Deprescribing'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater