Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

What should be included in the assessment of laypersons' paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Self-rated worry is associated with hospital admission in out-of-hours telephone triage - a prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. First-response treatment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a survey of current practices across 29 countries in Europe

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The Danish prehospital emergency healthcare system and research possibilities

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients - consensus and evidence based

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Using simulation to help healthcare professionals relaying patient information during telephone conversations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. What drives change in neonatal intensive care units? A qualitative study with physicians and nurses in six European countries

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Maintaining Competence in Airway Management

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Okay, let's talk - short debriefings in the operating room

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Assessment of laypersons' Paediatric Basic Life Support (PBLS) skills is important to ensure acquisition of effective PBLS competencies. However limited evidence exists on which PBLS skills are essential for laypersons. The same challenges exist with respect to the assessment of foreign body airway obstruction management (FBAOM) skills. We aimed to establish international consensus on how to assess laypersons' PBLS and FBAOM skills.

METHODS: A Delphi consensus survey was conducted. Out of a total of 84 invited experts, 28 agreed to participate. During the first Delphi round experts suggested items to assess laypersons' PBLS and FBAOM skills. In the second round, the suggested items received comments from and were rated by 26 experts (93%) on a 5-point scale (1 = not relevant to 5 = essential). Revised items were anonymously presented in a third round for comments and 23 (82%) experts completed a re-rating. Items with a score above 3 by more than 80% of the experts in the third round were included in an assessment instrument.

RESULTS: In the first round, 19 and 15 items were identified to assess PBLS and FBAOM skills, respectively. The ratings and comments from the last two rounds resulted in nine and eight essential assessment items for PBLS and FBAOM skills, respectively. The PBLS items included: "Responsiveness"," Call for help", "Open airway"," Check breathing", "Rescue breaths", "Compressions", "Ventilations", "Time factor" and "Use of AED". The FBAOM items included: "Identify different stages of foreign body airway obstruction", "Identify consciousness", "Call for help", "Back blows", "Chest thrusts/abdominal thrusts according to age", "Identify loss of consciousness and change to CPR", "Assessment of breathing" and "Ventilation".

DISCUSSION: For assessment of laypersons some PBLS and FBAOM skills described in guidelines are more important than others. Four out of nine of PBLS skills focus on airway and breathing skills, supporting the major importance of these skills for laypersons' resuscitation attempts.

CONCLUSIONS: International consensus on how to assess laypersons' paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills was established. The assessment of these skills may help to determine when laypersons have acquired competencies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Vol/bind26
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)9
ISSN1757-7241
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 18 jan. 2018

ID: 52568707