Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Variability between psychiatrists on domains of the mental status examination

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Automatically generated smartphone data and subjective stress in healthy individuals - a pilot study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Help-seeking behavior among Danish veterans with self-reported mental problems - a 22 years register-based follow-up study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Validation of the Danish version of the brief negative symptom scale

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Construct validity of the Mechanical Restraint - Confounders, Risk, Alliance Score (MR-CRAS): a new risk assessment instrument

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. A pilot study on high amplitude low frequency-music impulse stimulation as an add-on treatment for depression

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Arguments for a Phenomenologically Informed Clinical Approach to Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Selvmordsforebyggelse – hvordan kommer vi videre?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Background: The Mental Status Examination (MSE) is a core element of the psychiatric assessment. To investigate the current level of psychopathological knowledge, the reliability of the MSE can be used as a proxy as it is based on descriptive psychopathology.Methods: Three psychiatrists wrote their MSE based on 27 video recordings. The variability and inter-rater agreement were evaluated using an agreement scale from 1 to 5, made by several psychiatrists. The agreement was analysed by mean values, stratified mean values and Cronbach's alpha.Results: The total agreement had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 (p < 0.000). The grand mean of variability was 4.1 (SD = 0.8). The domains with the highest variability were Attitude (Est. = 3.5, SD = 0.9), Affect (Est. = 3.8, SD = 0.8) and Motor activity (3.7, SD = 0.9). The videos with the highest variability were #2 (Est.=3.3, SD = 1,1) and #21 (Est. = 3.6, SD = 1.1).Conclusions: The overall reliability of the MSE based on Cronbach's alpha was good and the mean variability was low. This indicates that the MSE performed by three psychiatrists is reliable. The main reason for variability was due to individual interpretation and discrepancies in literature. The literature-driven variability could possibly be reduced by approaching national tradition to international practise. The individual variability maybe reduced by increasing the opportunities for clinical group rating.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNordic Journal of Psychiatry
Sider (fra-til)1-6
Antal sider6
ISSN0803-9488
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 18 dec. 2019

ID: 58723055