Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Validity of the diagnosis of appendicitis in the Danish National Patient Register

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Response to Letter to the Editor: A misleading CFS prevalence estimate in DanFunD

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskning

  2. Lolland-Falster Health Study: Study protocol for a household-based prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Number of hospital contacts with alcohol problems predicts later risk of alcoholic liver cirrhosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Triage May Improve Selection to Colonoscopy and Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Colonoscopies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Quality of recovery after major emergency abdominal surgery. A prospective observational cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The incomplete story of complete mesocolic excision - Authors' reply

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskning

  4. 5-year outcome after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Aims: Appendicitis is a common disease. The nationwide Danish National Patient Register provides an important data source for epidemiological research. Data used in register-based epidemiological research needs to be validated. We aimed to validate the diagnosis of appendicitis in the Danish National Patient Register. Methods: From 1997 to 2015 nationwide data from the Danish National Patient Register, the Danish Pathology Register, and the Danish Civil Registration System were used to validate the diagnosis of appendicitis or the combination of the diagnosis for appendicitis and surgical removal of the appendix in the Danish National Patient Register. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated using pathology reports as golden standard. Results: Diagnosis of appendicitis in the Danish National Patient Register had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 0.928 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.927; 0.930), 0.995 (95% CI: 0.995; 0.995), 0.769 (95% CI: 0.767; 0.771), and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.999; 0.999). A diagnosis of appendicitis and a procedure code for surgical removal of the appendix had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 0.886 (95% CI: 0.885; 0.888), 0.998 (95% CI: 0.998; 0.998), 0.895 (95% CI: 0.894; 0.897), and 0.998 (95% CI: 0.998; 0.998). Conclusions: The diagnosis of appendicitis alone or in combination with the registered surgical removal of the appendix in the Danish National Patient Register showed acceptable validity. Whether to use the diagnosis for appendicitis only or in combination with procedure codes for the removal of the appendix depends on whether high sensitivity or high positive predictive values are warranted.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
BogserieScandinavian Journal of Public Health. Supplement
Vol/bind48
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)38-42
Antal sider5
ISSN1403-4956
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2020

ID: 59597043