Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Validation of the Danish version of the brief negative symptom scale

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Construct validity of the Mechanical Restraint - Confounders, Risk, Alliance Score (MR-CRAS): a new risk assessment instrument

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Physical discomfort in early pregnancy and postpartum depressive symptoms

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Time trends in referrals to child and adolescent gender identity services: a study in four Nordic countries and in the UK

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Per Bech 12.1.1942-9.5.2018 In Memoriam

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Widespread higher fractional anisotropy associates to better cognitive functions in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Visual attention in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder before and after stimulant treatment

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Remission from antipsychotic treatment in first episode psychosis related to longitudinal changes in brain glutamate

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Objective: The Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) is an instrument for evaluating negative symptoms (NS) in schizophrenia based on the 2005 consensus statement by the National Institute of Mental Health. This study examines the validity and reliability of the Danish version of BNSS. Materials and methods: Acutely and chronically affected patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were assessed with BNSS along with other psychopathological scales and clinical measures. Convergent and discriminant validity of BNSS was evaluated by its relationships with these assessments. Inter-rater agreement was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Forty-nine subjects were included; the mean age was 33.1 (±10.8) years and 32 (65%) were males. BNSS correlated strongly with traditional assessment tools for NS and poorly with measures of depressive and extrapyramidal symptoms, except for Parkinsonism. Moreover, BNSS correlated well with the assessment of positive symptoms. The ICC of BNSS was 0.95 (n = 19, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98). Conclusions: Overall, BNSS holds appropriate psychometric properties in terms of reliability and validity. However, discriminant validity was compromised by correlations with positive symptoms and Parkinsonism. The former originates presumably from NS secondary to positive symptoms since the sample included acutely psychotic patients, and the latter from overlapping rating criteria regarding facial expressivity impairment.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNordic Journal of Psychiatry
Vol/bind73
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)425-432
Antal sider8
ISSN0803-9488
DOI
StatusUdgivet - okt. 2019

ID: 58198817