Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Validation of subjective rating scales for assessment of surgical workspace during laparoscopy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Inadequate emergence after non-cardiac surgery-A prospective observational study in 1000 patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Time to onset of gastrointestinal bleeding in the SUP-ICU trial: a preplanned substudy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Heterogeneity of treatment effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients: A secondary analysis protocol

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Pantoprazole in ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding-1-year mortality in the SUP-ICU trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Storage time of red blood cells among ICU patients with septic shock

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. High-Throughput Sequencing-Based Investigation of Viruses in Human Cancers by Multienrichment Approach

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Adverse reactions of dimethyl sulfoxide in humans: a systematic review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. A national center for persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair: Five-year prospective data

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Recently, studies have focused on how to optimize laparoscopic surgical workspace by changes in intra-abdominal pressure, level of muscle relaxation or body position, typically evaluated by surgeons using subjective rating scales. We aimed to validate two rating scales by having surgeons assess surgical workspace in video sequences recorded during laparoscopic surgery.

METHOD: Video sequences were obtained from laparoscopic procedures. Eight experienced surgeons assessed the video sequences on a categorical 5-point scale and a numerical 10-point rating scale. Intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for intra- and inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS: The 5-point rating scale had an intra-rater ICC of 0.76 (0.69; 0.83) and an inter-rater ICC of 0.57 (0.45; 0.68), corresponding to excellent and fair reliability, respectively. The 10-point scale had an intra-rater ICC of 0.86 (0.82; 0.89) and an inter-rater ICC of 0.54 (0.39; 0.68), corresponding to excellent and fair as well. All surgeons used the full range of the 5-point scale, but only one surgeon used the full range of the 10-point scale.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, both scales showed excellent intra-rater and fair inter-rater reliability for assessing surgical workspace in laparoscopy. The 5-point surgical rating scale had all categories employed by all surgeons.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind61
Udgave nummer10
Sider (fra-til)1270-1277
Antal sider8
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2017

ID: 52069014