Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Validation of image cytometry for sperm concentration measurement: Comparison with manual counting of 4010 human semen samples

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Evaluation of algorithm development approaches: Development of biomarker panels for early detection of colorectal lesions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Clinical proteomics: Insights from IGF-I

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Clinical usefulness of bone turnover marker concentrations in osteoporosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Isotope-dilution TurboFlow-LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of ten steroid metabolites in serum

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. CENTRAL PRECOCIOUS PUBERTY IN TWO BOYS WITH PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ON GROWTH HORMONE TREATMENT

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. High maternal age at first and subsequent child births in Denmark in the mid-1800s-Letter to the editor

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Sperm concentration is an essential parameter in the diagnostic evaluation of men from infertile couples. It is usually determined by manual counting using a hemocytometer, and is therefore both laborious and subjective. We have earlier shown that a newly developed image cytometry (IC) method may be used to determine sperm concentration. Here we present a validation of the IC method by analysis of 4010 semen samples. There was high agreement between IC and manual counting at sperm concentrations above 3mill/ml and in samples with concentrations above 12mill/ml the two methods can be used interchangeable. However, we found substantial differences in samples below 3mill/ml. We also assessed the accuracy of the two methods by repeated measurements of 248 samples, which revealed that IC measurements seemed more accurate. Moreover, based on ten samples counted by several operators the IC method had a lower coefficient of variation than the manual method (5% vs 10%), indicating a better precision of the IC method. In conclusion, measurement of sperm concentration by IC can be used at concentrations above 3mill/ml and seems more accurate and precise than manual counting, making it an attractive option in the daily clinical practice.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry
Vol/bind468
Sider (fra-til)114-119
Antal sider6
ISSN0009-8981
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2017

ID: 52171200