Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Valid analytical performance specifications for combined analytical bias and imprecision for the use of common reference intervals

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. A simple clinical assessment is superior to systematic triage in prediction of mortality in the emergency department

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Gender-partitioned patient medians of serum albumin requested by general practitioners for the assessment of analytical stability

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Background Many clinical decisions are based on comparison of patient results with reference intervals. Therefore, an estimation of the analytical performance specifications for the quality that would be required to allow sharing common reference intervals is needed. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) recommended a minimum of 120 reference individuals to establish reference intervals. This number implies a certain level of quality, which could then be used for defining analytical performance specifications as the maximum combination of analytical bias and imprecision required for sharing common reference intervals, the aim of this investigation. Methods Two methods were investigated for defining the maximum combination of analytical bias and imprecision that would give the same quality of common reference intervals as the IFCC recommendation. Method 1 is based on a formula for the combination of analytical bias and imprecision and Method 2 is based on the Microsoft Excel formula NORMINV including the fractional probability of reference individuals outside each limit and the Gaussian variables of mean and standard deviation. The combinations of normalized bias and imprecision are illustrated for both methods. The formulae are identical for Gaussian and log-Gaussian distributions. Results Method 2 gives the correct results with a constant percentage of 4.4% for all combinations of bias and imprecision. Conclusion The Microsoft Excel formula NORMINV is useful for the estimation of analytical performance specifications for both Gaussian and log-Gaussian distributions of reference intervals.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry
Vol/bind55
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)612-615
ISSN0004-5632
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

ID: 52615460